Skip to main content

Is yasuola.com a Scam? Security Check Results - yasuola.com Reviews

yasuola.com favicon

Is yasuola.com Safe? Security Analysis for Request has been denied

Check if yasuola.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinasmall
SVGJavaScript
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 1:38:48 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website yasuola.com is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (Safeline WAF) blocking access with a threat detected message. The domain is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. since 2021, indicating a relatively new entity likely based in China. Due to the WAF block, no business content, contact information, or policies are accessible, limiting the ability to assess the business model or services. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with basic SVG and JavaScript usage, hosted on Alibaba Cloud. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or SSL details in the provided data. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to inaccessibility and lack of visible information.

Detected Technologies

SVGJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the lack of accessible content and absence of business-related information, it is not possible to determine the market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams of the entity behind yasuola.com. The domain age and registrar suggest a legitimate registration, but no further business intelligence can be extracted from the blocked page. No partnerships or related domains were identified. The site does not display any marketing or advertising technologies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is limited by the WAF block which indicates some level of threat detection and mitigation in place. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details were found in the data. The absence of privacy policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests low maturity in security governance and compliance. The WAF blocking may protect the site but also prevents legitimate access, which could impact business operations and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Review and adjust WAF rules to reduce false positives and allow legitimate user access.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website content is blocked by a Web Application Firewall (Safeline WAF) displaying a threat detected and request denied message.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
SVGJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible due to WAF blocking.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 0 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:yasuola.com
Issuer:Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Valid Until:8/4/2025 (0 days)
SANs:yasuola.com, www.yasuola.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(244 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.98.166.168
Name Servers:
dns3.hichina.com
dns4.hichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:421ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic web technologies including SVG for graphics and JavaScript for dynamic content. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications and does not include analytics or advertising scripts. Performance and mobile optimization appear basic but cannot be fully assessed due to the WAF block. The site would benefit from improved SEO metadata and accessibility features. Technical debt is likely low given the minimal content but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience and security.
Analyze Another Website