Skip to main content

Is yearn.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - Yearn Reviews

Y

Is yearn.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Yearn

Check if yearn.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/alarge
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:00:17 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Yearn is a prominent decentralized finance (DeFi) platform specializing in yield aggregation through compounding vaults and a growing app ecosystem. Founded in 2020, it targets cryptocurrency investors seeking optimized yield opportunities. The platform is well-positioned in the DeFi market with a strong community and multiple partner integrations enhancing its ecosystem. Technically, Yearn employs a modern web stack including Next.js and React, hosted likely behind Cloudflare DNS services. The website is fast, mobile-optimized, and provides a professional user experience. Analytics usage is minimal, relying on privacy-focused tools like Plausible. From a security perspective, Yearn demonstrates maturity with audited smart contracts and an active bug bounty program. However, the website lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and direct contact information, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the WHOIS data, which shows privacy protection typical for crypto projects. Overall, Yearn presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance and security headers would further strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Yearn operates as a decentralized finance yield aggregator, leveraging compounding vaults and community-built apps to provide optimized returns on digital assets. Its business model is based on aggregating yield opportunities and offering them through a user-friendly interface. The platform has established a robust partnership ecosystem with multiple DeFi projects and integrations, enhancing its market reach and service offerings. The target customers are crypto investors and DeFi users seeking efficient yield strategies. Yearn's competitive advantage lies in its battle-tested vaults, security audits, and active community governance. The project shows indicators of growth and ecosystem expansion through continuous partner collaborations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Yearn exhibits a mature security posture with audited smart contracts and a public bug bounty program hosted on Immunefi, signaling proactive vulnerability management. The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), which could mitigate certain web-based attacks. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response contact details are not publicly available, which could delay vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by implementing comprehensive security headers and publishing clear privacy and incident response policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Yearn

Description:

Yearn is DeFi's Yield Aggregator offering compounding vaults and an app ecosystem for digital asset yield optimization.

Key Services:
Compounding VaultsApp EcosystemPartner Integrations
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Bug bounty program
  • Audited smart contracts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Potential Subdomain Takeover

HIGH

Subdomain api.yearn.fi points to unregistered service d3ovxowcsriu34.cloudfront.net

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.1.1
Name Servers:
boyd.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
irma.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2382526014, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:165ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and fast performance. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare DNS services, contributing to reliability and security. The site is fully responsive with excellent mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of minimal analytics (Plausible) reflects a privacy-conscious approach. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The technical infrastructure is robust with low technical debt, but security headers should be added to mitigate potential web vulnerabilities.
Analyze Another Website