Skip to main content

Is yearn.space a Scam? Security Check Results - yearn.space Reviews

yearn.space favicon

Is yearn.space Safe? Security Analysis for Yearn Space

Check if yearn.space is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
ReactNext.jsVercel hostingGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:54:41 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Yearn Space is a newly established DeFi platform launched in 2024, focused on providing users with optimized risk-adjusted yields by aggregating access to Yearn Vaults across multiple popular crypto ecosystems. The platform positions itself as a gateway to decentralized finance yield opportunities, targeting crypto investors seeking efficient yield strategies. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. However, the site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and does not provide contact or security incident response information, which impacts its overall trustworthiness and compliance posture. Security-wise, the domain uses HTTPS and has transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating room for improvement in hardening the platform. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires enhancements in privacy, security policies, and transparency to improve user trust and regulatory compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsVercel hostingGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Yearn Space operates in the competitive DeFi finance sector, leveraging partnerships with multiple subdomains representing specialized yield protocols such as Ajna, Velodrome, and Curve. This ecosystem approach suggests a strategy of integrating best-in-class DeFi protocols to offer diversified yield products. The business model centers on yield aggregation and optimization, targeting crypto-savvy investors. The domain age and registration details align with the platform's recent launch, indicating a startup phase. Absence of detailed company information and contact channels limits external validation but the consistent branding and partner ecosystem indicate a focused niche presence. The use of minimal tracking and privacy-conscious analytics reflects an awareness of user privacy concerns, though formal policies are missing.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled, which protects against domain hijacking. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web-based attacks. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness for security events. The minimal use of tracking scripts (plausible analytics) is a positive privacy indicator. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and incident management.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The best risk adjusted yields in DeFi, on the best protocols in crypto. Yearn X takes you straight to Yearn Vaults from some of the most popular crypto ecosystems.

Key Services:
Access to Yearn VaultsAggregated DeFi yield optimization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsVercel hostingGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Vercel
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
plausible
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible.io
Marketing Tools:
plausible analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

69/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(318 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.16.65, 216.150.1.129
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.com
ns2.vercel-dns.com
SOA:Serial: 1721735264, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:143ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) and hosted on Vercel, which supports fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The use of Google Fonts and optimized images indicates attention to performance and user experience. The site structure is clear with a focus on partner integrations via subdomains. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected, suggesting a static or serverless architecture. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility is good but could be improved with more ARIA landmarks and semantic HTML. No forms collecting personal data are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website