Skip to main content

Is yeepay.com a Scam? Security Check Results - yeepay.com Reviews

Y

Is yeepay.com Safe? Security Analysis for yeepay.com

Check if yeepay.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:09:55 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website yeepay.com currently returns a 404 error with minimal content, indicating it is inaccessible or misconfigured. The domain is well-established, registered since 2005 with Alibaba Cloud as the registrar, suggesting a legitimate business presence. However, the lack of accessible website content, metadata, or contact information severely limits the ability to assess the company's services, market position, or digital maturity. Technically, the site lacks visible security headers, privacy policies, or any modern web technologies in the provided HTML snapshot. Security posture is weak due to absence of visible HTTPS enforcement and security best practices. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to unavailability and lack of transparency, requiring urgent remediation to restore trust and functionality.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Based on domain age and registrar data, yeepay.com appears to be a medium-sized entity operating in the finance sector, likely related to payment services given the domain name. However, no business descriptions, partner information, or service details are available from the current website content. The absence of contact details or certifications limits confidence in business credibility. The domain's longevity suggests an established operation, but the current website state undermines competitive positioning and customer engagement. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently poor due to the lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No security frameworks or certifications are indicated. The site does not provide any contact channels for security incidents or data protection officers. This exposes the business to potential risks including data breaches and compliance violations. Immediate improvements in SSL deployment, security policy publication, and incident response readiness are recommended.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore website accessibility and ensure the site does not return 404 errors.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible and returns a 404 error with message '404 Route Not Found'.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.163.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@qiye.163.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1264 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:58.83.141.71, 58.83.141.72, 58.83.141.74
Name Servers:
cns1.zdnscloud.net
dns1.zdnscloud.info
ins1.zdnscloud.com
vns1.zdnscloud.biz
MX Records:
5: hzmx01.mxmail.netease.com
10: hzmx02.mxmail.netease.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:419ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves minimal HTML content with no metadata, scripts, or external resources detected. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates potential technical debt and security gaps. No CMS or frameworks are detected from the content snapshot. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to inaccessible content. The site requires modernization and proper configuration to meet current web standards and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website