Skip to main content

Is yellowscreen.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Yellow Screen SIA Reviews

yellowscreen.lv favicon

Is yellowscreen.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Yellow Screen SIA

Check if yellowscreen.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressElementorManrope fontFira Code font
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:14:33 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Yellow Screen SIA is a Latvian small business with an online presence via a WordPress website using the Elementor page builder. The website content is minimal, lacking detailed descriptions of services or business operations. Contact information includes a Latvian phone number and a company email address, but no social media or extended business details are provided. The technical infrastructure is modern with HTTPS enabled and use of contemporary web fonts, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as limited content, suggests a low digital maturity level. Security posture is basic with no visible vulnerabilities but also no advanced protections. Overall, the website presents a low to moderate risk profile with recommendations to improve transparency, security headers, and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorManrope fontFira Code font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company appears to be a small Latvian entity operating in an unspecified sector, likely related to digital or screen-based services given the name. The lack of detailed business descriptions and absence of partner or subsidiary domains limits insight into market positioning or revenue streams. The website does not showcase competitive advantages or growth indicators. The business model and target customer segments remain unclear. The presence of a local phone number and company email suggests a focus on local or regional clients. No certifications or trust badges are displayed, and no strategic partnerships are evident from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@yellowscreen.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712695****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR or other data protection regulations. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present on the homepage, reducing immediate risk of data leakage. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Yellow Screen SIA

Description:

Yellow Screen SIA is a company presumably operating in Latvia, likely providing services related to digital or screen-based solutions given the name. The website content is minimal and does not provide detailed business descriptions or service listings.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorManrope fontFira Code font
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.15.231.203
Name Servers:
ns.mm88.lvDNS only
ns2.mm88.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: pasts1.atbalsts.it
SOA:Serial: 2025030701, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:407ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Elementor 3.28.4 page builder plugin, using modern web fonts (Manrope and Fira Code). The site loads external scripts for emoji support and uses a standard WordPress theme (twentytwentyfive). Performance appears moderate with lazy loading for background images implemented. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features like skip links are present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and RSS feeds but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content.
Analyze Another Website