Skip to main content

Is yfdnzf.com a Scam? Security Check Results - yfdnzf.com Reviews

Y

Is yfdnzf.com Safe? Security Analysis for yfdnzf.com

https://yfdnzf.com

Check if yfdnzf.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 4:40:19 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at yfdnzf.com presents minimal accessible content, primarily consisting of an iframe embedding external content with tracking pixels and obfuscated parameters. There is no visible business information, contact details, or privacy-related policies on the site. The domain WHOIS data is suspicious, showing a creation date in the future (2025-07-22) and listing the registrar company as the registrant, which undermines trust and legitimacy. Technically, the site lacks security headers, DNSSEC, and shows poor mobile and SEO optimization. The security posture is weak, with no clear evidence of HTTPS enforcement or best practices. Overall, the site appears to be either blocked by a security mechanism or intentionally minimal, with heavy tracking and advertising elements embedded.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No identifiable business information, company name, or sector is present on the website. The domain registration details do not match any legitimate business entity, and no contact or legal information is provided. The site does not demonstrate a clear business model or market positioning. The heavy use of tracking pixels and iframe embedding suggests a possible ad monetization or redirect service rather than a traditional business operation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor, with no DNSSEC enabled, no security headers detected, and suspicious WHOIS data. The presence of obfuscated tracking scripts and external iframe content raises privacy and security concerns. There is no evidence of incident response policies or security certifications. The site likely operates behind a generic WAF or security challenge, limiting content accessibility and analysis. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not evident.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Investigate and correct the domain registration details to reflect accurate and consistent information.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is minimal and consists mainly of an iframe embedding external content with tracking pixels and obfuscated parameters, indicating possible blocking or redirection by a security or anti-bot mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Custom tracking pixel from l.cdn-fileserver.com
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and primarily an iframe embedding external content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

45/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ~

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(290 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:208.91.196.46
Name Servers:
ns1.nsresolution.com
ns2.nsresolution.com
MX Records:
300: ~
SOA:Serial: 2011062801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:28ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses minimal HTML with embedded iframes and tracking pixels from external domains such as l.cdn-fileserver.com and find-searcher.com. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. The hosting provider is linked to the domain registrar PDR Ltd. The site lacks meta tags, structured data, or accessibility features. Performance is likely slow due to external iframe loading and tracking scripts. The technical implementation is basic and does not follow modern web development best practices.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about yfdnzf.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website