Skip to main content

Is yourlinkhere.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Digital Marketing Consultant Bill Scott Reviews

D

Is yourlinkhere.com Safe? Security Analysis for Digital Marketing Consultant Bill Scott

Check if yourlinkhere.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights)jQueryBootstrap+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:56:21 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website represents a digital marketing consultancy operated by Bill Scott, offering services such as SEO, PPC, strategic advice, and audits with over 26 years of experience. The business targets companies seeking to maximize their online marketing ROI through organic and paid strategies. The site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable risk factor, reducing domain trustworthiness despite professional content and clear contact information. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved compliance and domain legitimacy verification.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights)jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeElementor

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bill Scott operates as a small, independent digital marketing consultant focusing on ROI-driven SEO and PPC services. The business model is consulting-based with a focus on strategic planning and execution for clients. The website content and blog articles demonstrate expertise and thought leadership in digital marketing. The company appears to have a stable client base and certifications that support credibility. However, the lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may hinder trust from potential clients. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Analytics and SEO plugins but lacks visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential exists with enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

A*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+1602690****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and secure contact forms with anti-spam measures, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and domain registration transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Digital Marketing Consultant Bill Scott

Description:

Digital marketing consulting services focused on SEO, PPC, and maximizing return on ad spend with 26 years of experience.

Key Services:
Strategic adviceStrategy auditsSEO auditsPaid media managementContent creationBrand awareness campaigns
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights)jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeElementor
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact form with nonce and spam protection (honeypot)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional digital marketing consultant site with clear service offerings.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ptr include:secureserver.net ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:173.201.186.250
Name Servers:
ns51.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns52.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.yourlinkhere.com
SOA:Serial: 2023022600, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:433ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ptr include:secureserver.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and MonsterInsights for analytics. It employs Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. The technical implementation includes modern SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and there is no evidence of a hosting provider or CDN in the data. The site uses Google Analytics for user tracking with moderate tracking levels. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website