Skip to main content

Is yum.design a Scam? Security Check Results - Yum Reviews

yum.design favicon

Is yum.design Safe? Security Analysis for Yum

Check if yum.design is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
ReactNext.jsPagyJavaScriptWebP images+1 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:37:29 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Yum is a small, early-stage technology company offering a creative inspiration platform featuring designs, animations, branding, videos, and websites. The business is currently in private beta with over 600 users, targeting creative professionals and designers. The website is built on a modern tech stack including Next.js and React, hosted likely on Vercel, and optimized for performance and mobile devices. Analytics are implemented using privacy-focused services such as Fathom and Plausible. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact is limited to an email capture form with no direct emails or phone numbers provided. The domain is recently registered with privacy protection, consistent with the startup nature of the business.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsPagyJavaScriptWebP imagesVideo embedding

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Yum positions itself as a niche platform for creative inspiration, leveraging digital content such as designs and videos to attract a specialized audience. The business model appears to be SaaS or subscription-based, currently in private beta to build initial user base and feedback. The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital creative services. The use of privacy protection for domain registration is typical for startups. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The platform's early stage and limited public business information suggest a focus on product development and user acquisition.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue management. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of privacy-focused analytics tools is a positive privacy consideration. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Yum

Description:

Delicious designs, animations, branding, videos, websites, and more for your creative inspiration.

Key Services:
designsanimationsbrandingvideoswebsites
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsPagyJavaScriptWebP imagesVideo embedding
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom AnalyticsPlausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fathom AnalyticsPlausible Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Email capture form
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a creative design inspiration platform in private beta.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(48 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1730919257, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with a focus on performance and mobile optimization. Hosting appears to be on a modern platform such as Vercel, inferred from Sentry environment metadata. The site uses WebP images and embedded video content for rich media experience. Analytics are implemented with privacy-respecting tools. However, there is no detected CMS, and accessibility features are basic. SEO is adequately addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical risks that should be addressed to improve security and trust.
Analyze Another Website