Is yupana.finance Safe? Security Analysis for MadFish.Solutions
Check if yupana.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Yupana.finance is an open-source, decentralized lending protocol built on the Tezos blockchain, enabling users to deposit and borrow digital assets in a permissionless and non-custodial manner. The platform is developed by MadFish.Solutions, known for the Temple wallet and QuipuSwap DEX, positioning Yupana as a pioneering DeFi solution within the Tezos ecosystem. The website provides comprehensive documentation and links to the application, emphasizing transparency and community trust through external audits and open-source code repositories. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, ensuring a performant and mobile-optimized user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though improvements are recommended in security headers and incident response disclosures. Privacy compliance is addressed with clear policies, though cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, Yupana.finance presents a credible and professional DeFi platform with room for enhanced security and privacy practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Yupana.finance targets the growing decentralized finance market on the Tezos blockchain, offering lending and borrowing services that capitalize on the demand for trustless financial instruments. Its business model is based on smart contract-driven interest accrual and collateralized loans, appealing to crypto users seeking decentralized alternatives to traditional finance. The association with MadFish.Solutions and integration with popular Tezos tools strengthens its market position. Revenue streams likely include fees or interest spreads from lending activities. The platform's open-source nature and external audits enhance trust and facilitate community engagement. Partnerships and social media presence indicate active ecosystem participation, though direct contact information is limited, which is common in DeFi projects. Growth potential is tied to Tezos adoption and DeFi market expansion.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of smart contracts for non-custodial lending reduces centralized risk. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing despite cookie policy presence, which may impact privacy compliance. Overall, the platform shows good security fundamentals but should enhance transparency and technical controls to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
MadFish.Solutions
Yupana is an open-source, decentralized lending platform built to securely borrow and lend digital assets via smart contracts that provides the Tezos community with the benefits of decentralized financial applications.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Non-custodial smart contract based lending
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional, open-source DeFi lending platform on Tezos blockchain.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Strict DMARC Alignment
LOWStrict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 74 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings