Skip to main content

Is zacklabe.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Climate Central Reviews

zacklabe.com favicon

Is zacklabe.com Safe? Security Analysis for Climate Central

Check if zacklabe.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Statessmall
WordPress.com hostingJetpack pluginGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Google Analytics (legacy UA)Prebid.js for advertising+1 more
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:45:35 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Zachary Labe's website serves as a professional portfolio highlighting his expertise as a climate scientist affiliated with Climate Central and previous federal and academic institutions. The site focuses on climate data visualizations, research dissemination, and science communication, targeting researchers, students, and the interested public. Technically, the site is built on WordPress.com with modern web technologies and includes advertising and analytics integrations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though some security headers and DNSSEC are missing. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a dedicated privacy policy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with room for enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPress.com hostingJetpack pluginGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Google Analytics (legacy UA)Prebid.js for advertisingGravatar hovercards

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions Zachary Labe as an individual expert in climate science with strong institutional affiliations, leveraging his academic background and research to engage a broad audience through data visualizations and storytelling. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on outreach and professional presence. The site integrates advertising via WordPress.com WordAds and Google DoubleClick, likely to support hosting costs. The presence of professional social media links and academic profiles enhances credibility and networking potential. No direct sales or service offerings are evident, consistent with a personal academic portfolio.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from WordPress.com managed hosting, ensuring baseline security including HTTPS and domain transfer lock. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, representing potential areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which limits transparency in security governance. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and formal policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Climate Central

Description:

Personal website of Zachary Labe, a climate scientist at Climate Central, showcasing his research interests in climate risk, climate impacts, extreme events, AI/ML methods, and science communication through data visualizations.

Key Services:
Climate data visualizationsResearch disseminationScience communicationEducational outreach
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress.com hostingJetpack pluginGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Google Analytics (legacy UA)Prebid.js for advertisingGravatar hovercards
Frameworks:
WordPress Gutenberg
Platforms:
WordPress.com
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (Universal Analytics)WordPress.com Stats
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
WordAds (WordPress.com advertising)Google DoubleClickAditude
Tracking Pixels:
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing Tools:
WordPress.com Action Bar
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal professional portfolio of a climate scientist affiliated with reputable institutions.

šŸ›”ļøSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

šŸ‘¤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

šŸ›”ļøNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

šŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

šŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

šŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(330 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.24, 192.0.78.25
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.com
ns2.wordpress.com
ns3.wordpress.com
SOA:Serial: 2005071858, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

⚔Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

šŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on WordPress.com using the Gutenberg framework and Jetpack plugin, leveraging Google Fonts and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience including emoji support and image carousels. Advertising is managed through WordPress.com WordAds and Google DoubleClick with Prebid.js integration. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, typical for managed WordPress hosting with external scripts. No broken elements or errors were detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a professional academic portfolio.
Analyze Another Website