Skip to main content

Is zarpay.app a Scam? Security Check Results - ZAR Wallet Reviews

zarpay.app favicon

Is zarpay.app Safe? Security Analysis for ZAR Wallet

Check if zarpay.app is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
WebflowGoogle FontsFacebook PixelLenis (smooth scrolling)GSAP (animation)+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:53:17 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ZAR Wallet is a fintech platform offering a borderless USD wallet service available in over 110 countries. It enables users, particularly in cash-based economies, to convert cash into digital dollars instantly through a network of local merchants (agents). The platform also provides virtual and physical Visa debit cards integrated with Apple Pay and Google Pay, allowing global spending without foreign transaction fees. The business model centers on a 1% platform fee on transactions, targeting underserved populations to accelerate stablecoin adoption. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web technologies including GSAP for animations, Lenis for smooth scrolling, and Facebook Pixel for tracking. The site is mobile optimized, fast loading, and uses HTTPS with CDN hosting via AWS Cloudfront. However, it lacks some security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. There are no visible vulnerabilities or outdated libraries. However, the absence of published security policies and incident response contacts reduces transparency. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no explicit GDPR compliance or cookie consent. Overall, ZAR Wallet presents a professional and trustworthy fintech service with a clear business focus and modern technical implementation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security policy transparency, and user data protection would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsFacebook PixelLenis (smooth scrolling)GSAP (animation)SplitType (text animation)jQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ZAR Wallet occupies a niche in the fintech sector by bridging cash economies and digital stablecoins, targeting users in emerging markets who lack traditional banking access. Its agent-based model allows local merchants to facilitate cash-to-digital dollar exchanges, creating new revenue streams for agents and expanding financial inclusion. The platform's integration with global payment networks and mobile wallets positions it competitively for cross-border spending. The company leverages social media for brand presence but could benefit from expanded contact channels and clearer corporate disclosures to strengthen credibility and customer trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@zarpay.app

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no apparent exposure of sensitive information. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel is managed asynchronously, reducing performance impact. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking usage. Addressing these gaps would improve the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ZAR Wallet

Description:

ZAR is a borderless USD wallet available in 110+ countries, enabling users to save and spend in dollars globally without traditional banking limitations. It bridges the gap between cash-based economies and web3, accelerating stablecoin adoption for underserved populations. The platform facilitates instant cash-to-digital dollar exchanges via local merchants (agents), offers virtual and physical Visa debit cards, and supports Apple Pay and Google Pay. Users can avoid foreign transaction fees and access funds worldwide.

Key Services:
Cash to digital dollar exchange via agentsVirtual and physical Visa debit cardsIntegration with Apple Pay and Google PayAgent network for buying and selling digital dollarsMobile app for wallet management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsFacebook PixelLenis (smooth scrolling)GSAP (animation)SplitType (text animation)jQuery
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.zar.app ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns21.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns22.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025081900, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:198ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.zar.app ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and Lenis for smooth scrolling. It uses Google Fonts and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing analytics. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring fast content delivery globally. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and image optimization. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and implement advanced security headers.
Analyze Another Website