Skip to main content

Is zasahovasluzba.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - ZÁSAHOVÁ SLUŽBA S.R.O. Reviews

zasahovasluzba.cz favicon

Is zasahovasluzba.cz Safe? Security Analysis for ZÁSAHOVÁ SLUŽBA S.R.O.

Check if zasahovasluzba.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicmedium
Bootstrap 4.3.1jQuery 3.3.1Google reCAPTCHA v3CookiebotAnimate.css+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:14:00 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ZÁSAHOVÁ SLUŽBA S.R.O. operates a nationwide platform in the Czech Republic providing 24/7 immediate security intervention services through a network of partner security agencies and centralized monitoring stations. The company emphasizes modern technology, rapid response times, and standardized high-quality service delivery. Their business model focuses on collaboration with over 60 operators of centralized protection panels and 37 contracted security agencies, serving approximately 75,000 client objects. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Hosting utilizes Azure Blob Storage for static assets, and the site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. However, explicit HTTP security headers are not detected, representing an area for security enhancement. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. From a security perspective, the site integrates anti-bot measures and cookie consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the professional presentation and operational transparency of the business. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional HTTP security headers and published incident response policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve domain registration transparency, implement comprehensive security headers, and enhance incident response visibility. These steps will strengthen trust and compliance, supporting the company’s position as a reliable security service platform.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 4.3.1jQuery 3.3.1Google reCAPTCHA v3CookiebotAnimate.cssGoogle Fonts (Lato, Material Icons)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong market position as a centralized platform connecting multiple security agencies and monitoring operators across the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in standardized service quality, rapid response times averaging 10 minutes, and extensive partner network coverage. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts with monitoring centers and direct client engagements for property protection. The target customers include security agencies seeking broader client access and individuals or businesses requiring reliable security interventions. Growth indicators include the expanding partner base and the volume of interventions performed. The partnership ecosystem is robust, featuring numerous well-known security firms, enhancing credibility and operational reach. Strategic observations suggest the company leverages technology and partnerships effectively but should improve domain registration transparency to bolster trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@zasahovasluzba.cz

Phone Numbers (2)

+4202848*****
+4202848*****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

ZÁSAHOVÁ SLUŽBA S.R.O.

Registration Number:

242 95 507

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. Incident response information and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which could be a compliance gap. Overall, the security culture appears professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls to mitigate advanced threats and improve regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ZÁSAHOVÁ SLUŽBA S.R.O.

Description:

Projekt KRUH je otevřenou platformou pro poskytování služeb okamžitého bezpečnostního zásahu a dalších souvisejících služeb v režimu 24/7 pro provozovatele Pultů centralizované ochrany po celé České republice, prováděných v jednotném standardu, vysoké kvalitě a za využití moderních komunikačních technologií.

Key Services:
bezpečnostní zásah 24/7monitoring a reakce na mimořádné událostiinstalace zabezpečovacích systémůrychlý dojezd zásahových jednotek
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 4.3.1jQuery 3.3.1Google reCAPTCHA v3CookiebotAnimate.cssGoogle Fonts (Lato, Material Icons)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration for forms
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
CookiebotGoogle reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
CookiebotGoogle FontsAnimate.css
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:80.188.15.228 include:_spf.google.com a:hermes.ittechnik.cz -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

32 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:40.115.33.198
Name Servers:
ns1.regzone.czDNS only
ns1.regzone.de
ns1.regzone.info
MX Records:
0: zasahovasluzba-cz.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025061704, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:117ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:80.188.15.228 include:_spf.google.com a:hermes.ittechnik.cz -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design, jQuery 3.3.1 for DOM manipulation, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. Static assets are hosted on Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, indicating a cloud-based hosting approach. The site uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, supporting privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility at a basic level. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and WHOIS data transparency are notable risks. Opportunities exist to modernize security controls and improve domain registration visibility to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website