Skip to main content

Is zero.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Zerion Reviews

zero.network favicon

Is zero.network Safe? Security Analysis for Zerion

Check if zero.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Ethereum Layer 2ZK StackWebflow CMSVideo embeddingLottie animations+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:40:25 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ZERO Network is an Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain network developed by Zerion, integrated tightly with the Zerion Wallet to provide free crypto transactions leveraging ZK Stack technology. The website positions ZERO Network as a seamless, gas-free crypto experience targeting both end-users and developers with services including USDC transfers, NFT minting, cross-L2 bridging, and token swapping. The technical infrastructure is modern, utilizing Webflow CMS, video and Lottie animations, and minimal but effective analytics via Plausible. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies are absent. WHOIS data is privacy protected, common in crypto projects, but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response disclosures.

Detected Technologies

Ethereum Layer 2ZK StackWebflow CMSVideo embeddingLottie animationsPlausible Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ZERO Network operates in the blockchain technology sector as a Layer 2 Ethereum scaling solution integrated with Zerion Wallet, targeting over 500k Zerion users and crypto enthusiasts seeking zero gas fees. The business model focuses on providing free transactions and developer APIs to foster ecosystem growth. Partnerships with Highlight, Decent, and DODOEX indicate a collaborative approach to NFT analytics, bridging, and swapping services. The company leverages its parent brand Zerion for credibility and market reach. The website content and external links suggest a medium-sized, technology-focused entity with a clear growth and developer engagement strategy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web threats. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which may impact GDPR and other compliance requirements. Incident response contact information is not provided, reducing readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adding formal policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Zerion

Description:

ZERO Network is an Ethereum Layer 2 network with Free transactions in Zerion Wallet. Based on ZK Stack and developed by Zerion.

Key Services:
Free Ethereum Layer 2 transactionsUSDC transfersNFT mintingCross-L2 bridgingToken swappingZerion API for developers
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Ethereum Layer 2ZK StackWebflow CMSVideo embeddingLottie animationsPlausible Analytics
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
Zerion WalletEthereum
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible.io
Marketing Tools:
Plausible Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content and animations

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 23 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:13.49.111.177, 16.16.119.222, 51.21.126.187
Name Servers:
dean.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
emily.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381061639, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies such as HTML5 video, Lottie animations, and minimal JavaScript for analytics (Plausible). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features like focus-visible outlines. Performance is fast with efficient asset loading from CDN sources. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph images. Hosting appears to be Webflow's infrastructure, providing reliable uptime and scalability. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The technical implementation supports a smooth user experience and aligns well with the business goals.
Analyze Another Website