Skip to main content

Is zerobase.pro a Scam? Security Check Results - ZEROBASE Reviews

zerobase.pro favicon

Is zerobase.pro Safe? Security Analysis for ZEROBASE

Check if zerobase.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Next.jsReactJavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:22:34 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ZEROBASE is a technology company focused on building decentralized, trustless zero-knowledge (ZK) infrastructure for Web3 privacy and decentralized finance (DeFi). Their platform offers ZK proof services, confidential computing, and decentralized staking, aiming to secure next-generation blockchain ecosystems. The company positions itself as an emerging player in the blockchain privacy space, supported by notable investors and partners. The website content is professionally designed, targeting blockchain developers and DeFi users, with a focus on cryptographic trust and privacy technologies. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some areas such as accessibility and security headers could be improved. The SSL configuration is excellent, ensuring secure HTTPS connections. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No contact information or incident response channels are clearly provided, which could hinder security communication. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions, which slightly reduces trust but is common for .pro domains. The presence of reputable investors and partners supports the legitimacy of the business. Overall, ZEROBASE presents a credible and professional blockchain technology platform with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactJavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ZEROBASE operates in the blockchain technology and finance sectors, focusing on zero-knowledge proof infrastructure and decentralized staking services. Their business model revolves around providing cryptographic trust foundations for DeFi and Web3 ecosystems. The company targets blockchain developers, DeFi users, and Web3 participants, leveraging partnerships with venture capital firms and ecosystem programs to strengthen market presence. Revenue streams likely include staking services and proof generation fees. The company demonstrates growth through active campaigns, ecosystem collaborations, and media coverage. The partnership ecosystem includes well-known investors and strategic partners, indicating strong industry connections and potential for expansion.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible critical vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in best practices. No privacy or cookie policies are visible, which may impact GDPR and other privacy compliance. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels for security issues. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of user tracking, but data retention and privacy compliance details are missing. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and communication channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ZEROBASE

Description:

ZEROBASE is building the foundation of cryptographic trust for decentralized finance and beyond. We provide ZK proof services, confidential computing, and decentralized staking to secure the next generation of blockchain ecosystems.

Key Services:
ZK proof servicesConfidential computingDecentralized staking
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactJavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:zerobase.pro
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/9/2025 (63 days)
SANs:zerobase.pro, *.zerobase.pro

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.48.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.32.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001
Name Servers:
demi.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
ruben.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381785546, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with some images preloaded for faster rendering. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance which could affect user trust and regulatory adherence.
Analyze Another Website