Is zestprotocol.com Safe? Security Analysis for Zest Protocol
Check if zestprotocol.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Zest Protocol is a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform focused on enabling Bitcoin holders to earn additional BTC or borrow against their BTC holdings. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Webflow platform, incorporating interactive Lottie animations and standard analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The platform targets Bitcoin users interested in liquidity solutions within the DeFi ecosystem. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and age, which could impact trust. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and no direct company contact information is provided, relying instead on community channels like Discord and Twitter. Security posture is moderate with basic protections but missing advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Zest Protocol positions itself as a niche player in the Bitcoin DeFi liquidity market, offering services to put Bitcoin to work or borrow against it. The business model revolves around smart contracts operating on-chain, emphasizing transparency and open-source code. The target audience includes Bitcoin holders and DeFi users seeking liquidity options. The website's content quality and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a small-sized enterprise. The lack of detailed company information and domain registration data limits full business credibility assessment. The presence of active social media and community engagement channels suggests a focus on decentralized community-driven growth.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, indicating a baseline security posture. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to enhance security. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust in the DeFi space. The absence of direct contact information for security incidents further limits incident response readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency measures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Zest Protocol
Zest Protocol enables users to put their Bitcoin to work. Earn more BTC, or borrow against your BTC. Zest Protocol is a DeFi protocol built for Bitcoin. Its smart contracts operate on-chain and are open-source.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
- Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link and Google Tag Manager)
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professionally designed Webflow site focused on Bitcoin DeFi liquidity services.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
Strict DMARC Alignment
LOWStrict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 32 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings