Skip to main content

Is zhonghesoft.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 杭州筑龙信息技术股份有限公司 Reviews

Is zhonghesoft.com Safe? Security Analysis for 杭州筑龙信息技术股份有限公司

Check if zhonghesoft.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinamedium
jQuery 1.9.1Swiper.jsBaidu Analytics
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 7:19:21 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

杭州筑龙信息技术股份有限公司旗下的众和软件专注于建筑施工企业的工程项目管理软件开发,拥有超过15年的行业经验。其产品集成了协同办公和项目管理功能,服务覆盖全国多个省市,客户包括国家企业及地方民营企业。网站内容丰富,涵盖产品介绍、解决方案、客户案例及行业新闻,体现出较强的行业专业性和市场定位。技术上,网站采用了jQuery和Swiper等成熟前端技术,并集成了百度分析工具,性能表现中等,移动端优化基础。安全方面,网站使用HTTPS,但缺乏安全头部配置和隐私合规声明,存在一定的合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,影响域名信任度,但整体业务信息和网站内容显示出较高的专业性和可信度。建议加强隐私政策建设和安全配置以提升整体安全与合规水平。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.9.1Swiper.jsBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

众和软件在建筑施工行业内具有较强的市场竞争力,依托筑龙股份的背景,提供专业的项目管理软件和信息化解决方案。其业务模式以软件销售和定制服务为主,客户群体涵盖大型国企及地方企业,显示出良好的市场渗透力。网站展示了丰富的客户案例和行业新闻,反映出活跃的市场运营和客户支持体系。缺乏公开的隐私政策和安全响应机制是潜在的合规短板。整体来看,公司具备稳定的业务基础和成长潜力,建议关注数字化转型和安全合规的持续投入。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

400*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站启用了HTTPS,保障了数据传输的基本安全,但未检测到常见的安全HTTP头部如Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options等,存在一定的安全加固空间。未发现公开的安全政策、事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,可能影响安全事件的快速响应和用户信任。网站未包含隐私政策和Cookie政策,存在合规风险。建议完善安全头部配置,公开安全政策和事件响应流程,增强用户数据保护和合规性。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策,提升合规性。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

杭州筑龙信息技术股份有限公司

Description:

众和工程项目管理软件是一款集协同办公、项目管理等功能于一体的综合性工程管理软件系统,围绕建筑施工企业核心业务,结合管理实际,自主研发直营联营项目管理系统和协同办公系统,能为客户提供成熟的信息化解决方案。

Key Services:
工程项目管理软件协同办公系统直营联营项目管理系统行业信息化解决方案
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.9.1Swiper.jsBaidu Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data on homepage

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language targeting construction project management sector.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(475 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:118.31.228.148
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
f1g1ns2.dnspod.net
MX Records:
10: mx.ym.163.com
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 1648099354, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:420ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用传统的前端技术栈,包括jQuery 1.9.1和Swiper组件,适合展示丰富的内容和交互。集成百度统计实现用户行为分析。页面结构清晰,SEO基础良好,但移动端优化不足,viewport标签被注释。未检测到现代前端框架或CMS,可能存在技术债务。性能表现中等,建议升级技术栈和增强响应式设计以适应多终端访问需求。安全配置方面缺少关键HTTP安全头,存在潜在风险。
Analyze Another Website