Skip to main content

Is zibll.com a Scam? Security Check Results - zibll.com Reviews

zibll.com favicon

Is zibll.com Safe? Security Analysis for WordPress主题模板_WP中文社区论坛主题_zibll主题_子比主题官网

Check if zibll.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrapFontAwesome+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:29:54 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.zibll.com is a Chinese WordPress theme provider specializing in themes for personal and enterprise users, with a focus on e-commerce and community forums. The site offers modular, elegant WordPress themes tailored for the Chinese market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Zibll operates in the technology sector, specifically in WordPress theme development for the Chinese market. Its business model revolves around theme sales and customization, targeting personal bloggers and enterprises needing e-commerce capabilities. The site positions itself as a niche provider with a strong focus on modular design and ease of use. The lack of public WHOIS data and absence of contact information may limit trust for new customers. The use of Baidu Analytics indicates a focus on Chinese user tracking and marketing. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and uses standard security practices but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. No security.txt or incident response contacts are found, which limits the ability to report vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, but improvements are needed to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

zibll主题子比主题专为个人、企业的WordPress主题美化设计开发,wp主题采用简约优雅的设计风格搭配强大的商城功能以及易用的模块化配置,成为更加适合中文wordpress商城主题模板、wordpress企业主题模板、wordpress博客主题模板。

Key Services:
WordPress theme designWordPress theme salesE-commerce functionality integrationModular configuration for themes
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiper.js
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese WordPress theme provider focused on e-commerce and community themes

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(531 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:43.159.98.19, 43.159.99.19
Name Servers:
dns3.hichina.com
dns4.hichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025042409, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap and jQuery. It uses Baidu Analytics for user tracking. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported with meta keywords and description tags. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Analyze Another Website