Skip to main content

Is ziller-holding.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Ziller Holding GmbH & Co. KG Reviews

ziller-holding.de favicon

Is ziller-holding.de Safe? Security Analysis for Ziller Holding GmbH & Co. KG

Check if ziller-holding.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingGermanylarge
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics 4+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:06:08 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Ziller Holding GmbH & Co. KG is a well-established German holding company founded in 1926, managing a portfolio of over 25 companies primarily in the production and industrial services sectors. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with a focus on showcasing its business portfolio. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, complemented by Google services for analytics and tag management. The site implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, enhancing privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages are not detected in the provided content, which slightly impacts privacy compliance scoring. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its business scale and industry.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics 4Google MapsReal Cookie Banner Pro

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates as a holding entity with diversified subsidiaries in manufacturing and industrial services, targeting business clients in these sectors. Its long history since 1926 positions it as a stable player with a broad portfolio. The website's use of multilingual support and SEO optimization indicates a strategy to reach wider markets. The absence of direct sales or e-commerce features suggests a B2B business model focused on portfolio management and corporate communications. The integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports data-driven marketing and user behavior analysis. No direct partnerships or subsidiary domains were identified beyond the main domain.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

m*****@nilos.de

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent system that documents user consents thoroughly. No critical vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response procedures, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site uses reputable third-party services with appropriate legal bases for data processing. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ziller Holding GmbH & Co. KG

Description:

Seit 1926 vereint die Ziller Holding mehr als 25 Unternehmen aus den Bereichen Produktion und Industrieservice.

Key Services:
ProductionIndustrieservice
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics 4Google MapsReal Cookie Banner Pro
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with documented consent storage
  • Use of Google Consent Mode
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics 4
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

60/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 11 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.250.91.246
Name Servers:
ns01.cmfx.de
ns02.cmfx.de
MX Records:
0: zillerholding-de01e.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025051405, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics 4 for tracking and analytics, along with Google Maps for location services. The cookie consent is managed by Real Cookie Banner Pro, which supports granular consent and Google Consent Mode. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets optimized with caching and minification. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found in the content. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional corporate website.
Analyze Another Website