Skip to main content

Is zirgupasts.net a Scam? Security Check Results - zirgupasts.net Reviews

Z

Is zirgupasts.net Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if zirgupasts.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
LiteSpeed Web Server
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:25:43 PM
32
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at zirgupasts.net is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page that blocks access to any meaningful content. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 2017 and is set to expire in 2026, indicating a moderate domain age. However, the lack of accessible content, metadata, or contact information prevents any substantive analysis of the business or services offered. Technically, the site is served by LiteSpeed Web Server but lacks HTTPS and security headers, which are critical for secure web presence. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no forms or social media links are found. This severely limits the ability to assess compliance or security posture. Overall, the site appears to be either under maintenance, misconfigured, or intentionally restricted, resulting in a low trust and credibility rating.

Detected Technologies

LiteSpeed Web Server

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests it is not newly created, but no company name, sector, or services are disclosed. There are no visible partnerships or related domains. The lack of contact details and policies further limits any assessment of market positioning or business model.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor given the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security or incident response policies. The domain has standard registrar locks enabled but lacks DNSSEC. The 403 Forbidden response indicates some access control is in place, but without further information, it is unclear if this is intentional or a misconfiguration. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are detected due to lack of content. Overall, the site does not demonstrate adherence to security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page denying access to the resource. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is blocked.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
LiteSpeed Web Server
SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:89.111.20.183 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.23.36
Name Servers:
cloudns.hostnet.lvDNS only
cloudns2.hostnet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: zirgupasts.net
SOA:Serial: 2025060101, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:179ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:89.111.20.183 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on LiteSpeed Web Server with DNS hosted on cloudns1.hostnet.lv and cloudns2.hostnet.lv. The domain is registered via GoDaddy.com, LLC with standard domain status locks but no DNSSEC. The HTML content is minimal and only shows a 403 Forbidden error page with no metadata, scripts, or structured data. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical setup appears basic and incomplete, with critical gaps in security and content delivery.
Analyze Another Website