Skip to main content

Is zirk.us a Scam? Security Check Results - zirk.us Reviews

zirk.us favicon

Is zirk.us Safe? Security Analysis for zirk.us

Check if zirk.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
Mastodon 4.4.3Ruby on RailsReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG icons+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:11:01 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

zirk.us operates as an independent Mastodon server focused on the arts and humanities community, providing a niche social networking platform within the fediverse. The website targets readers, writers, academics, and enthusiasts of literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, and architecture. It positions itself as a community-driven platform emphasizing open conversation and cultural engagement. The domain is mature, registered since 2004, and hosted under GoDaddy.com, LLC with a registrant address in Germany, aligning with the website's language and content focus. Technically, the site runs Mastodon version 4.4.3, leveraging Ruby on Rails and React frameworks, with modern JavaScript module usage and SVG-based iconography. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. Hosting details beyond the registrar are not explicit. No CMS is detected, consistent with Mastodon's custom platform nature. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place, but lacks security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy exists but no cookie consent or terms of service pages are found. No incident response or security contact information is published. No advertising or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for its target audience, but could improve privacy compliance and security hardening. The lack of explicit contact information and terms of service may impact user trust and legal compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency are recommended.

Detected Technologies

Mastodon 4.4.3Ruby on RailsReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsCSS with integrity hashes

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

zirk.us serves a specialized market segment within the fediverse, focusing on arts and humanities communities. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche content and community focus rather than scale. The business model is community-driven social networking without evident monetization or advertising. The target customers are academics, writers, and cultural enthusiasts seeking an ad-free, algorithm-free social experience. Growth indicators include a moderate active user base (612 active users) and ongoing platform updates. The ecosystem includes open source Mastodon software and external content delivery via cdn.masto.host. No formal partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The site maintains a consistent brand aligned with its cultural mission.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes prohibitive status flags to prevent unauthorized changes. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance gaps exist due to missing cookie consent and terms of service. Incident response readiness is unclear as no security contacts or policies are published. The security culture appears basic but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

zirk.us

Description:

Literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, architecture: join the circus of the arts and humanities! For readers, writers, academics or anyone wanting to follow the conversation.

Key Services:
Mastodon social networkingCommunity engagementContent sharing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Mastodon 4.4.3Ruby on RailsReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsCSS with integrity hashes
Frameworks:
Ruby on RailsReact
Platforms:
FediverseMastodon
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientUpdateProhibited and clientTransferProhibited flags

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon social network instance focused on arts and humanities

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:cst.fenwick@gmail.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(239 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:178.33.220.142
Name Servers:
ns33.domaincontrol.com
ns34.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023092301, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:143ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Mastodon 4.4.3, Ruby on Rails backend, and React frontend components. JavaScript modules and CSS assets are loaded with integrity hashes, indicating attention to resource integrity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses SVG icons for scalability. Performance is moderate, likely due to dynamic content loading and federated network interactions. No CMS is detected, consistent with Mastodon's architecture. Hosting provider details beyond domain registrar are not explicit. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve resilience.
Analyze Another Website