Skip to main content

Is zixiaoyun.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 承德新擎网络科技有限公司 Reviews

zixiaoyun.com favicon

Is zixiaoyun.com Safe? Security Analysis for 承德新擎网络科技有限公司

Check if zixiaoyun.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
jQueryZUI (Zentao UI)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 12:12:24 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

薄荷图床由承德新擎网络科技有限公司运营,是一家专注于提供图片及多格式文件上传和外链服务的技术公司。其服务覆盖跨境电商、短信营销、网站博客及文件存储等多个领域,提供免费及会员付费服务,支持批量上传和全球CDN加速。网站内容丰富,涵盖辅助工具、API接口及详细帮助文档,体现出较高的数字化成熟度。技术栈基于现代前端技术,使用ZUI框架和jQuery,整体性能适中,移动端优化基础。安全方面,网站启用HTTPS,但缺少DNSSEC和部分安全头,未见完整的隐私合规机制。业务信息透明,拥有多项企业资质和备案,增强用户信任。整体风险较低,适合一般用户和企业使用。

Detected Technologies

jQueryZUI (Zentao UI)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

薄荷图床在国内图床市场占据重要位置,凭借不限流量和多格式支持优势,吸引了大量跨境电商及营销客户。其商业模式结合免费基础服务和会员增值服务,促进用户转化和收入增长。网站展示了丰富的辅助工具和API接口,提升用户粘性和平台竞争力。合作伙伴包括母公司承德新擎网络科技有限公司及旗下相关平台,形成较为完善的生态体系。市场定位清晰,注重合规和资质,具备良好的成长潜力和品牌信誉。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

8*****@31list.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站整体安全措施基本到位,采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,限制上传文件大小和格式,防止滥用。缺少DNSSEC和安全HTTP头,存在一定安全提升空间。未发现明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露。缺少公开的事件响应和漏洞披露政策,建议完善以提升安全透明度和用户信任。隐私合规方面,缺少cookie同意机制,可能存在合规风险。总体安全成熟度中等,适合当前业务需求,但需持续改进。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以增强域名解析安全

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

承德新擎网络科技有限公司

Description:

薄荷图床是一款不限流量的图床软件,支持批量上传,不仅仅是图片,您还可以上传文档,PDF,表格,音视频,压缩包等数百种格式。不限流量,不限上传次数,全球CDN加速,累计外链次数已经超过了四亿次。

Key Services:
图片上传与外链生成文档及多格式文件上传批量上传全球CDN加速API接口服务辅助工具(图片压缩、EXIF提取、视频转换等)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryZUI (Zentao UI)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
ZUI
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CDN for acceleration
  • Multiple file upload restrictions
  • File size limits
  • Network connectivity detection scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website provides a comprehensive image and file hosting service with free and paid tiers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:101.42.165.253
Name Servers:
fig.dnspod.netDNS only
gilbert.dnspod.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1749430034, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:369ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用现代前端技术栈,基于ZUI和jQuery构建,结构清晰,支持多种上传方式和辅助工具。使用CDN加速内容分发,提升访问速度。技术实现稳定,支持批量上传和多格式文件处理。部分脚本用于网络状态检测和用户交互,提升用户体验。缺少CMS标识,可能为定制开发。性能适中,移动端优化基础,SEO配置良好。建议加强安全头和隐私合规技术实现。
Analyze Another Website