Skip to main content

Is zmlly.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 博雅特产网 Reviews

zmlly.com favicon

Is zmlly.com Safe? Security Analysis for 博雅特产网

Check if zmlly.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailChinasmall
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeSwiper
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 10:27:22 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

博雅特产网是一家专注于中国各地土特产、特产礼盒及相关旅游文化内容的综合信息平台。网站内容丰富,涵盖特产介绍、旅游景点推荐及民俗文化分享,定位于中国国内消费者及特产批发商,市场定位为中国最大的特产信息网站之一。技术上,网站采用了jQuery、Bootstrap和Font Awesome等成熟前端技术,具备良好的移动端适配和用户体验,但缺乏现代安全配置和隐私合规措施。安全方面,网站未启用DNSSEC,缺少安全HTTP头,且无隐私政策或Cookie政策,存在合规风险。整体风险中等,建议加强安全配置和合规建设以提升信任度和用户保护。

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeSwiper

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

博雅特产网通过内容聚合和信息展示的商业模式,主要服务于特产消费者和批发商,提供丰富的产品介绍和旅游文化内容。网站通过友情链接构建合作伙伴网络,增强内容丰富度和访问量。作为新成立的业务,网站尚未展示明确的联系方式或法律合规文件,表明其业务仍处于发展初期。市场竞争中,凭借内容广泛和地域覆盖优势,具备一定的竞争力,但需完善合规和安全措施以提升商业信誉和用户信任。

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前安全成熟度较低,缺少关键安全HTTP头和DNSSEC支持,未见HTTPS配置细节,且无隐私或安全政策披露。网站未提供安全事件响应渠道,缺乏漏洞披露机制,存在潜在的合规和安全风险。建议尽快实施HTTPS强制、配置安全头、启用DNSSEC,并发布隐私及安全政策,建立安全事件响应流程以提升整体安全水平和合规性。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用并强制HTTPS,确保数据传输安全。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

博雅特产网

Description:

博雅特产网是中国最大的特产网站,主要提供全国各地特产、土特产、特产礼盒、名优特产、农产品、水果、美食、特色小吃、副食品、工艺品等特产批发及全国旅游攻略、旅游景点推荐及全国各地方的民俗文化知识分享。

Key Services:
特产信息发布特产批发信息旅游景点推荐民俗文化知识分享
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeSwiper
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese about local specialty products and tourism.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 10 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.49
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1747329974, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:429ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用传统前端技术栈,使用jQuery、Bootstrap和Font Awesome,页面结构清晰,移动端适配良好。性能表现中等,未见明显技术债务。缺少现代安全配置和合规文件,存在技术升级和安全加固空间。建议引入现代前端框架和自动化安全扫描工具,提升技术现代化水平和安全防护能力。
Analyze Another Website