Skip to main content

Is zodia-custody.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Zodia Custody Reviews

zodia-custody.com favicon

Is zodia-custody.com Safe? Security Analysis for Zodia Custody

Check if zodia-custody.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Kingdommedium
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotreCAPTCHA
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:28:17 PM
74
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Zodia Custody is a specialized financial services company focused on providing institutional-grade digital asset custody solutions. Founded in 2023 and headquartered in the United Kingdom, the company targets global institutional investors, offering secure custody, trading, staking, and gateway services for digital assets. The website reflects a strong market position with partnerships and trust from leading financial institutions, emphasizing regulatory compliance and security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 1. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and employs modern SEO and analytics tools, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA integration, and adherence to bank-grade security standards, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR considerations. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure digital presence aligned with its business objectives.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Zodia Custody operates in the finance sector, specifically in digital asset custody for institutional clients. Its business model revolves around providing secure, compliant custody and trading infrastructure for cryptocurrencies and digital assets, supported by a comprehensive ecosystem including staking and rewards. The company leverages partnerships with major financial institutions and emphasizes regulatory adherence to build trust. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on growth and market penetration in the institutional digital asset space. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled client onboarding process, likely to maintain compliance and security standards. The partnership with branding agency Fable&Co. indicates investment in professional marketing and brand consistency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of Zodia Custody's website is strong, with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. The company holds ISO 27001 and SOC 1 certifications, indicating mature internal security controls. However, some common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected, which could enhance protection against certain web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of security appropriate for a financial services provider.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Zodia Custody

Description:

Crypto Custody, Without Compromise. Empowering global institutions to navigate the digital asset landscape simply, safely, and without compromise.

Key Services:
CustodyInterchangeGatewayStakingRewardsSolutions
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotreCAPTCHA
Platforms:
AWS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 1)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAME-ORIGIN"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@zodia.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.21, 141.193.213.20
Name Servers:
ns-1364.awsdns-42.orgDNS only
ns-1708.awsdns-21.co.ukDNS only
ns-337.awsdns-42.comDNS only
ns-562.awsdns-06.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: zodiacustody-com01c.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:136ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization. It uses AWS for hosting and DNS services, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Google Analytics and HubSpot are integrated for analytics and marketing automation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. Use of reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam. The technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, with no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and DNS security. Overall, the technical stack supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Analyze Another Website