Skip to main content

Is zokyo.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Domains By Proxy, LLC Reviews

zokyo.io favicon

Is zokyo.io Safe? Security Analysis for Domains By Proxy, LLC

Check if zokyo.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
FramerGoogle FontsHTTPS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:01:31 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Zokyo is a specialized blockchain security service provider focusing on safeguarding smart contracts and digital assets. Their offerings include smart contract audits, wallet penetration testing, DeFi security, and blockchain penetration testing, targeting Web3 developers and crypto projects. The company operates in the technology sector and was founded in 2019, with domain registration protected by privacy services, which is common in this industry. The website is professionally designed using Framer CMS, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, it lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, which impacts trust and compliance perception. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and relevant but could improve transparency and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

FramerGoogle FontsHTTPS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Zokyo positions itself as a niche player in the blockchain security market, offering comprehensive audit and penetration testing services for smart contracts and crypto assets. Their business model is service-oriented, catering to blockchain developers and DeFi platforms. The company benefits from a consistent brand and clear service descriptions but lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified given the sensitive nature of security services. The absence of direct contact details and policies may limit customer confidence and regulatory compliance. Growth potential exists in the expanding blockchain security market, but enhanced transparency and compliance documentation would strengthen market positioning.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

h*****@zokyo.ioReady
h*****@zokyo.ioZokyo

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited formal incident response readiness. No contact channels for security incidents were identified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to enhance compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Domains By Proxy, LLC

Description:

Safeguard your smart contracts and digital assets to proactively discover threats

Key Services:
Web3 SecurityWallet PentestingBlockchain AuditsSmart Contract AuditsCrypto Security AuditsDeFi SecurityBlockchain Penetration TestingEthereum SecuritySolidity SecuritySmart Contract Vulnerability
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerGoogle FontsHTTPS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

73/100
Score

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(286 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
ns03.domaincontrol.com
ns04.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025062600, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern web fonts and served over HTTPS with GoDaddy as the registrar and DNS provider. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of security headers and absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicate a minimalistic technical implementation. Performance is moderate, likely due to the use of external font resources and Framer hosting. There is an opportunity to enhance technical robustness by integrating security best practices and improving accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website