Skip to main content

Is zotabox.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Zotabox Reviews

zotabox.com favicon

Is zotabox.com Safe? Security Analysis for Zotabox

Check if zotabox.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPress 6.7.2Bootstrap v5.3.3Google FontsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:57:30 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Zotabox operates a website offering over 20 marketing tools designed to increase sales and subscriber counts, targeting online businesses and marketers. The platform is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and tracking technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. The website demonstrates a good level of technical maturity with modern frameworks and responsive design. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are critical for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data for the subdomain info.zotabox.com is unavailable, which is typical for subdomains, but no registrant information is provided for the main domain in the data given. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.7.2Bootstrap v5.3.3Google FontsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelMicrosoft ClarityCrisp ChatZotabox Widgets

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Zotabox positions itself as a provider of marketing widgets and tools, likely operating on a SaaS business model targeting small to medium-sized online businesses. The company leverages a partner domain zotabox.com and integrates various third-party services for analytics and advertising. The absence of detailed business registration or contact information limits deeper business intelligence. The site’s content and structure suggest a focus on user acquisition through free tools and marketing enhancements. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Ads and Facebook retargeting, indicating active digital marketing efforts.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which is a gap in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified from the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Zotabox

Description:

Provides marketing tools to increase sales and get more subscribers, offering 10 free tools as per JSON-LD description.

Key Services:
Marketing toolsSubscriber growth toolsSales increase tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.7.2Bootstrap v5.3.3Google FontsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelMicrosoft ClarityCrisp ChatZotabox Widgets
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for tracking
  • Use of Microsoft Clarity for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Microsoft ClarityGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMicrosoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Zotabox Widgets
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based marketing tools platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

90/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:45.56.80.41 ip4:45.32.74.251 ip4:45.63.53.84 ip4:45.32.66.101 ip4:66.96.187.3 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:zotabox.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/15/2025 (39 days)
SANs:zotabox.com, *.zotabox.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(382 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.12.201, 104.26.13.201, 172.67.75.122
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:dc9, 2606:4700:20::681a:cc9, 2606:4700:20::ac43:4b7a
Name Servers:
aida.ns.cloudflare.com
buck.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382456031, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:178ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:45.56.80.41 ip4:45.32.74.251 ip4:45.63.53.84 ip4:45.32.66.101 ip4:66.96.187.3 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 using Bootstrap 5.3.3, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates multiple analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. No hosting provider information was identified. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability standards. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed.
Analyze Another Website