Is zsoute.com Safe? Security Analysis for 中华特产网
Check if zsoute.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
中华特产网 is a Chinese specialty product and tourism information website that aggregates content about local specialties, traditional foods, handicrafts, cultural knowledge, and travel destinations. It positions itself as one of the largest and most popular specialty product portals in China, targeting a general audience interested in regional products and cultural tourism. The business model centers on content aggregation and information dissemination without direct commercial sales. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, with a custom or unknown CMS. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic but present through meta tags and structured navigation. The domain is secured with HTTPS, but no advanced security headers or DNSSEC are implemented. From a security perspective, the site lacks published privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The WHOIS data is consistent and shows a recently registered domain with standard domain status locks, indicating legitimacy. No adult or explicit content is present, and the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges. Overall, the website is functional and provides relevant content but lacks important privacy and security compliance features. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
中华特产网 operates as a content portal focusing on Chinese regional specialties, traditional foods, and tourism information. Its market position as a leading specialty product website in China is supported by a broad content offering and partnerships with related sites. The business model relies on content aggregation rather than direct sales, targeting consumers interested in cultural and culinary tourism. The site shows signs of a small-sized operation with a recent founding date in 2025. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple related external domains linked as friendly or partner sites. Growth potential lies in expanding content depth, improving user engagement, and enhancing compliance with privacy and security standards.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status locks to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and published privacy or security policies. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve its security maturity and compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
中华特产网
中华特产网,中国最大的特产网站,汇聚全国各地特产,土特产,休闲食品,传统美食,特色小吃,手工艺品,购物攻略,民俗文化,旅游景点等名优特产信息,是国内最受欢迎的特产网站之一。
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
- Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a Chinese specialty product and tourism information portal.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Soon
HIGHSSL certificate expires in 10 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings