Skip to main content

Is zuskm.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Základní umělecká škola Kroměříž Reviews

zuskm.cz favicon

Is zuskm.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Základní umělecká škola Kroměříž

Check if zuskm.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationCzech Republicmedium
WordPressPHPjQueryRevolution SliderWPBakery Page Builder+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 7:55:05 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

ZUŠ Kroměříž is a Czech basic art school providing comprehensive arts education including music, dance, literary-dramatic, and visual arts primarily targeting children and the local community. The website reflects a well-structured and professionally maintained digital presence using WordPress CMS with modern plugins and design elements. Security posture is good with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though some legacy scripts could be updated. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR and cookie policies clearly presented. However, the lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its educational mission effectively.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryRevolution SliderWPBakery Page BuilderPhoto Gallery pluginGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The institution operates as a public educational entity focused on arts education in the Kroměříž region. Its business model is non-commercial, serving students and families interested in arts development. The website supports this with event announcements, schedules, and contact information. The school maintains active social media channels to engage its audience. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual but does not detract from the school's established local presence. No commercial or advertising activities are evident, aligning with its educational sector role.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and includes important security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, though the use of an older jQuery migrate script suggests some technical debt. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential areas for improvement in formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but could be enhanced by updating scripts and adding formal security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update jQuery and related JavaScript libraries to latest versions to avoid deprecated functions.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Základní umělecká škola Kroměříž

Description:

A basic art school in Kroměříž offering music, dance, literary-dramatic, and visual arts education to children and youth.

Key Services:
Music educationDance educationLiterary-dramatic educationVisual arts educationOrganizing concerts and cultural events
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryRevolution SliderWPBakery Page BuilderPhoto Gallery pluginGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce in AJAX calls

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally maintained educational institution site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:gajdik@zuskm.cz
Forensic Reports:gajdik@zuskm.cz\

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:89.221.213.21
Name Servers:
ns.wedos.com
ns.wedos.czDNS only
ns.wedos.eu
ns.wedos.net
MX Records:
0: zuskm-cz.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072701, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 with WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider plugins. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 with jQuery Migrate 3.4.1, Google Fonts, and several photo gallery plugins. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses AJAX with nonce tokens for security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization of JavaScript libraries and enhanced accessibility.
Analyze Another Website