Skip to main content

Is zzmch.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 厦门财税网 Reviews

zzmch.com favicon

Is zzmch.com Safe? Security Analysis for 厦门财税网

Check if zzmch.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceChinamedium
jQuerySwiper.js
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:52:47 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

厦门财税网是一家成立于2010年的专业工商财税代理服务机构,主要面向中国中小微企业,提供包括公司注册、代理记账、财务审计、税务筹划、商标注册及资质代办等一站式企业服务。网站内容丰富,涵盖多种业务介绍和行业资讯,体现了较强的业务专业性和市场覆盖能力。技术上,网站采用jQuery和Swiper.js等成熟前端技术,具备基本的移动端适配,但在性能和现代化方面仍有提升空间。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺乏DNSSEC和安全HTTP头,且未公开隐私政策和安全响应信息,存在一定合规和安全风险。域名WHOIS信息显示注册日期异常,晚于公司成立时间,影响业务可信度。整体来看,网站业务内容专业且完整,但安全和合规性需加强以提升用户信任和法律合规水平。

Detected Technologies

jQuerySwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位为中国中小微企业提供专业的工商财税服务,拥有超过十年的行业经验和客户基础。其业务模式为线上线下结合的代理服务,涵盖注册、记账、审计、税筹等多个环节,形成一站式服务闭环。合作伙伴众多,显示良好的行业生态和市场渗透。网站内容定期更新,反映出活跃的市场运营和客户教育策略。尽管如此,域名注册信息与业务历史不符,可能影响潜在客户的信任感。公司通过电话和网站提供直接联系渠道,但缺少电子邮件和社交媒体互动,限制了多渠道客户沟通。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

133*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站启用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,但未启用DNSSEC,存在DNS欺骗风险。缺少安全HTTP头如Content-Security-Policy和X-Frame-Options,增加了XSS和点击劫持风险。无隐私政策和Cookie政策,可能导致合规风险,尤其是GDPR等国际法规。未提供安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,降低了安全事件处理能力。整体安全成熟度中等偏下,建议加强安全策略和合规措施以降低潜在风险。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以增强域名解析安全

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

厦门财税网

Description:

财税网为中小微企业提供专业的财税咨询、注册公司、财务审计、节税筹划、公司变更、审计报告、公司核名、增资验资、专利申请、公司记账代理、商标注册代理、资质代办、工商注册查询、代理记账等企业服务。

Key Services:
公司注册代理记账财务审计税务筹划商标注册资质代办公司变更公司注销进出口权办理
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerySwiper.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and services

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.28
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1751793053, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:344ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于传统前端技术栈,使用jQuery和Swiper.js实现交互和轮播效果,结构清晰,内容丰富。未检测到现代前端框架或CMS,可能限制扩展性和维护效率。页面响应速度适中,移动端适配基本,但无明显高级性能优化。缺少ARIA标签和辅助功能支持,影响无障碍访问。SEO基础良好,包含关键词和描述元标签,但缺少结构化数据和Open Graph标签,限制社交媒体展示效果。整体技术架构稳定但有升级空间。
Analyze Another Website