Security Directory

T

Triton Digital

tritonrankers.com

0

The website exhibits significant security and compliance deficiencies that expose the business to elevated risks, including data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Critical gaps exist in email authentication and security headers, leaving the platform vulnerable to phishing, cross-site scripting, and clickjacking attacks. Compliance with GDPR and NIS2 directives is notably weak, with missing privacy policies, lack of incident response procedures, and absence of documented security frameworks, which could result in legal consequences and loss of customer trust. While network security and DNS health show relatively strong postures, foundational elements like SSL/TLS management and security headers require urgent attention. The absence of key security headers and policies compromises data integrity and user privacy. Overall, the current posture demands immediate remediation to protect sensitive information, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain business continuity. Failure to address these issues promptly could lead to operational disruptions and financial losses.

S

SalesHood

saleshood.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally stable network and email security posture, with no critical vulnerabilities identified. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations, reflected by low scores in these areas and several high-severity issues. The absence of essential documentation such as cookie policies, consent mechanisms, security frameworks, and incident response procedures exposes the business to regulatory fines and reputational damage. Medium-level issues like expiring SSL certificates, mixed content, and missing security headers further increase the risk of data breaches and undermine user trust. While foundational network security is strong, the lack of proactive governance and transparency measures hinders overall security maturity. Addressing these shortcomings is critical to ensuring regulatory compliance, safeguarding customer data, and maintaining business continuity. Immediate focus on policy development and compliance will mitigate liability and enhance stakeholder confidence.

N

Nintex

nintex.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities identified, but multiple high and medium-level issues significantly impact its resilience and regulatory compliance. Key concerns include missing essential security headers, absence of critical GDPR compliance elements such as a cookie policy and consent banner, and lack of foundational security governance frameworks in line with NIS2 requirements. While SSL/TLS and network security configurations are relatively strong, gaps in header security and incident response preparedness expose the business to risks such as clickjacking, cross-site scripting, and data privacy violations. The absence of documented security and incident response policies further increases operational risk and potential regulatory penalties. Immediate attention to compliance and security framework establishment will reduce exposure and build customer trust. Overall, the company should prioritize governance, compliance, and foundational web security improvements to elevate its security maturity. Continued monitoring and remediation will protect brand reputation and reduce financial and legal risks.

P

Pearson Online Academy

pearsononlineacademy.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium severity issues that pose significant risks. Key deficiencies exist in security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory adherence, potentially exposing the organization to data breaches, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. The lack of a Content-Security-Policy header and missing incident response procedures are notable gaps. GDPR compliance is weak, with missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, risking non-compliance penalties. On the positive side, email security, SSL/TLS configuration, DNS health, and network security show good maturity. However, expiring SSL certificates and incomplete DNS configurations require prompt attention. Addressing these vulnerabilities will enhance customer trust, regulatory compliance, and resilience against cyber threats.

P

Pearson

lumerit.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but multiple high and medium-risk issues that need immediate attention. Key weaknesses include missing essential security headers, weak SSL configurations, and significant GDPR compliance gaps such as the absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Additionally, the lack of documented information security frameworks, incident response procedures, and business continuity plans exposes the organization to regulatory and operational risks, especially under NIS2 requirements. While email and network security appear robust, the overall low scores in GDPR and NIS2 compliance indicate potential legal liabilities and increased exposure to security incidents. Proactive remediation will safeguard customer trust, ensure regulatory compliance, and protect business continuity. Prioritizing these improvements is crucial to mitigating reputational and financial risks associated with data breaches and non-compliance penalties.

C

Cognia, Inc.

cognia.org

0

The website currently exhibits significant security and compliance gaps that could expose the business to data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. There are no critical vulnerabilities, but multiple high-severity issues exist, particularly around missing security headers, GDPR compliance, and foundational information security controls aligned with NIS2 requirements. Key deficiencies include missing privacy and cookie policies, lack of incident response and security governance documentation, and imminent SSL certificate expiration. While the network security posture and DNS health are generally strong, weaknesses in SSL/TLS configuration and email authentication present risks. The low scores in security headers, GDPR, and NIS2 modules highlight urgent areas needing attention to protect customer data and maintain regulatory compliance. Overall, the business risks non-compliance fines and increased exposure to cyberattacks without swift remediation. Addressing these gaps will improve trust with customers and partners while reducing operational risks.

P

Pearson

connectionseducation.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium risks that could impact compliance, reputation, and operational resilience. Key concerns lie in the absence of essential security headers and critical GDPR compliance elements such as cookie policies and consent mechanisms, exposing the business to legal and regulatory risks. The lack of foundational NIS2 security governance structures—including incident response, security policies, and business continuity planning—represents significant operational vulnerabilities. SSL/TLS and network security are strong points, minimizing exposure to common transport-layer attacks. However, DNS security can be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records to prevent domain-based attacks. Overall, the website requires urgent improvements in governance and compliance controls to mitigate potential data breaches and regulatory penalties while strengthening security best practices to protect user data and business continuity. Failure to address these gaps may result in reputational damage, legal sanctions, and operational disruptions.

C

Connections Education LLC

connexus.com

0

The website demonstrates significant security gaps, particularly in foundational security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 cybersecurity requirements. While there are no critical vulnerabilities, the presence of multiple high-severity issues exposes the business to risks including data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Missing key HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security and Content-Security-Policy increase susceptibility to man-in-the-middle attacks and cross-site scripting. GDPR non-compliance, including absent cookie policies and consent mechanisms, risks legal consequences and loss of customer trust. The lack of documented security policies, incident response, and vulnerability disclosure processes indicates immature cybersecurity governance. Positively, email security, SSL/TLS, DNS, and network security posture are strong, providing a solid foundation for further improvements. Prioritizing remediation will protect sensitive data, ensure regulatory compliance, and reduce operational risks. Immediate attention to security headers and GDPR controls is recommended to mitigate exposure and legal liabilities.

P

Pearson

pearsonaccelerated.com

0

The website's overall security posture reveals significant gaps primarily in compliance with privacy regulations and foundational security policies. While technical protections like email security, SSL/TLS configurations, and network security are strong, critical governance and policy frameworks such as GDPR compliance and NIS2 requirements are largely absent or insufficient. Missing privacy and cookie policies, lack of consent mechanisms, and absence of incident response and security documentation expose the business to regulatory fines and reputational damage. Additionally, key security headers are missing, increasing the risk of client-side attacks. The DNS security posture is moderate but can be improved. Addressing these issues promptly will reduce legal risks, protect customer data, and strengthen the company’s cybersecurity resilience. Overall, the website is vulnerable to regulatory scrutiny and certain attack vectors, necessitating immediate attention to governance and policy controls alongside technical improvements.

C

Connections Academy

connectionsacademy.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues but multiple high and medium-severity gaps, particularly in compliance and governance areas. Key deficiencies exist in GDPR compliance, including missing cookie policy and consent mechanisms, which expose the business to regulatory risks and potential fines. The absence of a formal information security framework, incident response procedures, and security policies under NIS2 regulations significantly increases operational risk and reduces preparedness against cyber threats. Security header implementation is incomplete, notably lacking a Content-Security-Policy header, increasing exposure to client-side attacks such as cross-site scripting. While email security and network security are relatively strong, some medium-level concerns such as expiring SSL certificates and missing DKIM records could impact secure communications and trustworthiness. Addressing these gaps is crucial to safeguarding customer data, maintaining regulatory compliance, and ensuring business continuity. Prioritizing governance, compliance, and foundational security controls will substantially reduce risk and enhance stakeholder confidence.

P

Pearson

pearsonhighered.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation in network security, SSL/TLS configurations, and email security, with scores above 80% in these areas. However, significant gaps exist in security headers implementation, data privacy compliance (GDPR), and adherence to the NIS2 directive, with scores as low as 25%. The absence of critical policies such as Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy, incident response, and security documentation exposes the business to regulatory and reputational risks. Missing Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy headers increase the risk of client-side attacks. Lack of GDPR compliance elements, including cookie consent and third-party privacy transparency, could lead to legal penalties and loss of customer trust. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and business continuity planning further weakens the organization's resilience against cyber threats. Overall, while technical defenses are solid, governance, compliance, and data protection require urgent attention to safeguard the business and maintain stakeholder confidence.

P

Pearson

microsoftpressstore.com

0

The website demonstrates a concerning security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected but multiple high and medium severity issues across key domains. Security headers are inadequately implemented, leaving the site vulnerable to common web attacks and data leakage. Compliance with GDPR is significantly lacking, as no privacy or cookie policies and consent mechanisms are in place, exposing the business to regulatory penalties. The absence of foundational information security frameworks, policies, and incident response procedures under the NIS2 directive further increases risks of prolonged downtime and compliance failures. While email security and network security show strong maturity, gaps remain in TLS configuration and DNS security features that may expose data in transit and DNS-based attacks. Overall, immediate focus is needed on establishing governance policies, improving security headers, and ensuring regulatory compliance to protect reputation and avoid costly fines. Addressing these issues will enhance trust, reduce risk, and support business continuity in an evolving threat landscape.

C

Cisco

umbrella.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities identified; however, several high and medium-risk issues expose the organization to compliance, reputational, and operational risks. The absence of key GDPR documentation and user consent mechanisms significantly jeopardizes regulatory compliance and could result in legal penalties and loss of customer trust. Missing security headers like Strict-Transport-Security and incomplete email security configurations increase exposure to interception and phishing attacks. The lack of incident response procedures, business continuity plans, and vulnerability disclosure policies limits the organization's ability to effectively manage and recover from security incidents. SSL/TLS certificates nearing expiration and missing DNSSEC deployment further reduce the robustness of the site's external defenses. Positively, network security and DNS health scores indicate strong foundational controls. Addressing these gaps promptly will enhance regulatory compliance, reduce attack surface, and strengthen overall resilience against cyber threats.

C

Cisco

cloudlock.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities identified, but several high and medium-risk issues require immediate attention. Key deficiencies exist in regulatory compliance, particularly GDPR, with missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of user consent mechanisms, exposing the business to legal and reputational risks. Security headers and transport security settings are insufficient, increasing the risk of data interception and session hijacking. Incident response, vulnerability disclosure, and business continuity plans are absent, which could impair rapid threat mitigation and recovery. Email security and DNS configurations are generally sound, though improvements like DKIM and DNSSEC are needed. Network exposure is minimal but the presence of an open SSH service could be an entry point for attackers. Addressing these gaps will strengthen compliance, protect customer data, and enhance overall resilience against cyber threats.

W

Webex

webexone.com

0

The website demonstrates strong SSL/TLS and network security configurations, reflecting a solid foundation for secure communications. However, critical gaps exist in email authentication protocols, exposing the business to phishing and spoofing risks. Compliance with GDPR and NIS2 requirements is notably deficient, with missing privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and essential security documentation, which could lead to legal and regulatory repercussions. The absence of an incident response plan and security contact information further amplifies risk exposure in case of breaches. DNS security is moderately strong but could be improved with DNSSEC enablement. Overall, while technical defenses are in place, governance and compliance weaknesses present significant vulnerabilities that could damage reputation and incur fines. Immediate attention is required to address legal compliance and email security to protect both the business and its customers.

C

Cisco

vidcast.io

0

The overall security posture of the website shows significant gaps, particularly in security headers, compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations, and email security protocols. While there are no critical vulnerabilities, the presence of multiple high and medium severity issues indicates an elevated risk of data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. The website lacks essential security headers, exposing it to common web-based attacks such as clickjacking, XSS, and content injection. Compliance shortcomings, including absence of a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy policy, increase legal risks under GDPR. Deficiencies in incident response, security policies, and security framework adherence undermine resilience to cyber incidents. Email security weaknesses like missing SPF and DKIM records elevate the risk of phishing and domain spoofing. Some progress is visible in network security and DNS health, but critical SSL/TLS configurations require urgent attention to maintain data confidentiality and integrity.

C

Cisco Meraki

meraki.com

0

The website security assessment reveals a concerning overall security posture, with no critical issues but multiple high and medium severity gaps primarily in security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory requirements. The absence of key HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy exposes the site to common web attacks like clickjacking, cross-site scripting, and protocol downgrade attacks. GDPR compliance is significantly lacking, including no privacy or cookie policies and missing consent mechanisms, which risks regulatory fines and reputational damage. Furthermore, the absence of an information security framework, security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates immature security governance and preparedness. While email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security show relatively strong scores, foundational web security and compliance weaknesses present substantial business risks. Immediate remediation of compliance and security policy gaps will reduce legal exposure and enhance customer trust. Overall, the organization must prioritize establishing formal security frameworks and policies alongside implementing critical security headers and GDPR controls to strengthen its security and legal standing.

C

Casted

casted.us

0

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium severity issues that could expose the business to regulatory, reputational, and operational risks. Key deficiencies exist in GDPR compliance, NIS2 security governance, and SSL/TLS configurations, which could lead to legal penalties and undermine customer trust. Missing essential security headers increase the risk of web-based attacks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. The absence of incident response and security policies indicates immature cybersecurity governance, potentially prolonging recovery times after an incident. Although email and network security are strong, foundational security practices require urgent attention to safeguard sensitive customer data and ensure regulatory compliance. Immediate remediation will strengthen the company's defenses, reduce legal exposure, and improve overall resilience. Prioritizing these gaps aligns security efforts with business continuity and customer trust imperatives.

P

Paymentwall, Inc.

paymentwall.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate to weak overall security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium severity findings that present significant risk. Key vulnerabilities stem from missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures such as cookie policies and consent mechanisms, and insufficient adherence to NIS2 cybersecurity regulations including absent incident response and security policy documentation. While network security and email security are strong, deficiencies in SSL/TLS configurations and DNS security also expose the site to potential threats. The absence of a comprehensive information security framework and business continuity planning further exacerbates operational risk. Immediate remediation is necessary to protect customer data, ensure regulatory compliance, and reduce the likelihood of reputational damage or legal penalties. Addressing these gaps will strengthen the organization's security posture and build customer trust.

I

IMDb.com, Inc.

boxofficemojo.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical issues found but several high and medium severity vulnerabilities that require immediate attention. Key weaknesses lie in missing essential HTTP security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures, and inadequate adherence to NIS2 security frameworks. These gaps expose the business to risks such as clickjacking, cross-site scripting, regulatory non-compliance, and operational disruption due to lack of incident response and security policies. On a positive note, email security, SSL/TLS configuration, DNS health, and network security show strong performance, reducing exposure to common attack vectors. However, the absence of cookie consent mechanisms and security documentation significantly increases legal and operational risks. Addressing these issues promptly will improve customer trust, regulatory compliance, and overall resilience against cyber threats. Prioritizing governance and policy-based controls alongside technical fixes is critical for sustainable security posture enhancement.

A

AbeBooks

abebooks.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected; however, several high and medium-risk issues indicate significant gaps in compliance and information security management. Notably, the absence of a Content Security Policy and incomplete GDPR adherence expose the business to data privacy risks and potential regulatory penalties. The lack of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure protocols highlights weaknesses in organizational security governance. While network security and email security are relatively strong, weaknesses in SSL/TLS configuration and DNS settings present opportunities for exploitation. These deficiencies collectively increase the risk of data breaches, reputational damage, and legal non-compliance, which can have severe business impacts. Addressing these issues promptly will enhance customer trust, regulatory compliance, and overall resilience against cyber threats. Prioritizing governance and compliance-related shortcomings alongside technical controls will deliver the greatest business value. Continuous monitoring and improvement are recommended to maintain and advance security standards.

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, and strong network security measures in place. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulatory frameworks, reflected by low scores of 43 and 25 respectively. High-severity issues such as the absence of a cookie policy, consent banner, security documentation, and incident response procedures expose the business to legal, reputational, and operational risks. Email security protocols and SSL/TLS configurations are adequate but require improvements to prevent phishing and data interception. DNS health and security headers are mostly well-configured, though some enhancements are advisable. Overall, the site is protected against common network threats but needs urgent attention on regulatory compliance and incident preparedness to mitigate potential business disruptions and fines. Addressing these gaps will strengthen trust with customers and regulators while enhancing resilience against cyber incidents.

R

RaiseDonors

raisedonors.com

0

The website demonstrates a concerning security posture with no critical issues but multiple high and medium severity vulnerabilities across key areas. Significant gaps in security headers and SSL/TLS configurations expose the site to common web attacks such as clickjacking, content injection, and man-in-the-middle risks. Compliance with GDPR is weak, notably lacking cookie policies and consent mechanisms, which can lead to legal and reputational risks. The absence of documented information security frameworks, incident response procedures, and security policies under NIS2 regulation further increases organizational risk and potential regulatory penalties. While email security and network security show relatively strong postures, foundational controls in web security, privacy compliance, and incident management require urgent attention. Overall, the current state could negatively impact customer trust, lead to data breaches, and incur regulatory fines. Immediate remediation is essential to strengthen defenses and ensure compliance with legal and industry standards.

The website demonstrates a solid technical security foundation with strong network security and security headers, and generally good SSL/TLS and DNS health. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulatory frameworks, exposing the business to legal, operational, and reputational risks. The absence of a cookie policy, consent banner, and comprehensive privacy policy undermines user trust and violates privacy regulations. Critical NIS2 shortcomings, including missing information security framework, security policies, incident response procedures, and security contact information, leave the organization vulnerable to cyber incidents and regulatory penalties. Email security is moderate but requires improvement to prevent phishing and spoofing attacks. Addressing these gaps is urgent to reduce exposure to compliance fines, data breaches, and operational disruptions. Overall, while technical controls are strong, governance and compliance controls need immediate attention to ensure holistic security and regulatory adherence.

C

CoStar Group

costargroup.com

0

The website demonstrates a solid foundation in core security areas such as email security, SSL/TLS, and network security, each scoring a perfect 100. However, significant gaps exist in compliance and governance frameworks, particularly around GDPR and NIS2 regulations, with both modules scoring only 25 out of 100. The absence of fundamental privacy documentation and consent mechanisms exposes the business to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Additionally, missing security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure programs highlight a lack of mature security governance. Weaknesses in HTTP security headers, though lower in severity, still present opportunities for attackers to exploit browser-based vulnerabilities. DNS security is moderately strong but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records. Overall, the organization must urgently focus on compliance and governance controls to mitigate legal risks and improve customer trust, while continuing to maintain its current technical security strengths.

E

EarthX

earthxtv.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate to poor overall security posture, with critical gaps in key areas such as security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 requirements. No critical vulnerabilities were found, but several high-severity issues pose significant risks including missing essential HTTP security headers and lack of foundational security policies and procedures. GDPR compliance is insufficient, risking regulatory penalties and damaging customer trust due to missing cookie consent and incomplete privacy practices. The absence of incident response and business continuity plans further increases operational risk. Email security and network security are relatively strong, but SSL/TLS implementation weaknesses and DNS configuration gaps expose the site to man-in-the-middle and spoofing attacks. Immediate attention to security headers and policy frameworks is essential to reduce exposure to common web attacks and regulatory non-compliance. Overall, the organization should prioritize governance, technical controls, and compliance to safeguard data and maintain business continuity.

E

EarthX

earthxmedia.com

0

The website exhibits a concerning security posture with multiple high and medium risk issues, particularly in security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 regulatory requirements. Critical headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy are missing, exposing the site to common web-based attacks like clickjacking and content injection. GDPR compliance gaps, including the absence of a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy policies, present legal and reputational risks. The lack of documented information security frameworks, incident response procedures, and business continuity planning reflects immature security governance. SSL/TLS weaknesses, including weak key lengths and certificates nearing expiration, threaten encrypted communications. While network security posture and DNS health are relatively strong, key DNS security features like DNSSEC are absent. Overall, immediate improvement is needed in governance, compliance, and foundational security controls to reduce risk and ensure regulatory alignment.

V

Virtuous Software

virtuous.org

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected but multiple high and medium priority issues that expose it to significant risk. Key weaknesses lie in missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures, and inadequate implementation of NIS2 security frameworks, which collectively threaten data protection and regulatory adherence. SSL/TLS configurations need urgent improvement due to weak key lengths and impending certificate expirations, increasing susceptibility to interception. DNS and network security are relatively strong, and email security is excellent, providing a solid foundation in those areas. However, the absence of incident response procedures and security policy documentation highlights a lack of preparedness for security incidents. The missing cookie policy and consent mechanisms further expose the business to legal and reputational risks under data privacy regulations. Addressing these issues promptly will strengthen the website’s defenses, ensure compliance, and safeguard customer trust.

I

Institutional Real Estate, Inc.

irei.com

0

The website exhibits a concerning security posture with no critical issues but multiple high and medium severity vulnerabilities. Key deficiencies exist in security headers, exposing the site to clickjacking, XSS, and content injection attacks. GDPR compliance is weak, lacking cookie policies and consent mechanisms, which risks regulatory penalties and erodes customer trust. The absence of a formal information security framework, incident response, and security policies under NIS2 regulations exposes the business to operational risks and potential regulatory non-compliance. SSL/TLS configurations are suboptimal, featuring weak encryption and expiring certificates, increasing susceptibility to interception. DNS security is moderate but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records. While email and network security are strong, the overall posture demands urgent remediation to protect business assets, ensure compliance, and maintain customer confidence.

C

CoStar

costar.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation with excellent SSL/TLS and network security scores. However, there are significant concerns regarding GDPR compliance and organizational security governance, as indicated by the lack of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and documented security frameworks. Missing critical security headers, particularly the Content-Security-Policy, expose the site to web-based attacks like XSS. The absence of incident response procedures and business continuity plans under the NIS2 framework increases operational risk in case of security breaches. While email security and DNS health are solid, the lack of DNSSEC and vulnerability disclosure policies limit the overall resilience. Immediate attention is required to address compliance and governance gaps to avoid regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Strengthening these areas will improve trust with customers and partners while reducing business risk.

E

EarthX

earthx.org

0

The website demonstrates a generally moderate security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium risks that could impact business continuity, customer trust, and regulatory compliance. Key deficiencies include missing critical security headers and lack of foundational security policies such as incident response and business continuity planning. GDPR compliance gaps like the absence of a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy documentation pose legal and reputational risks. The NIS2 framework adoption is notably weak, indicating insufficient organizational security governance and readiness. Email security and SSL/TLS configurations are adequate but require improvements to prevent phishing and data interception. DNS and network security show solid implementation, which reduces exposure to certain attack vectors. Overall, immediate attention to security headers, policy frameworks, and regulatory compliance is vital to strengthen defenses and maintain stakeholder confidence.

O

Old Parkland

oldparkland.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation, with excellent scores in email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security. However, significant gaps exist in governance and compliance areas, particularly relating to GDPR and NIS2 regulatory requirements. The absence of key privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and documented information security frameworks exposes the business to legal risks, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Missing security headers and incomplete incident response and business continuity plans increase vulnerability to cyberattacks and operational disruptions. Immediate remediation in compliance documentation and security governance is critical to align with legal obligations and protect customer trust. Proactive management of expiring SSL certificates and DNSSEC implementation will strengthen overall resilience. Addressing these issues will reduce regulatory exposure and enhance the organization's security maturity, supporting sustainable business growth.

C

Crow Holdings

crowholdings.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical issues detected but multiple high and medium-risk vulnerabilities that require urgent attention. Key areas of concern include missing security headers, significant gaps in GDPR compliance, and inadequate implementation of the NIS2 directive requirements. The absence of essential security policies, incident response procedures, and security contact information poses substantial operational and regulatory risks. SSL/TLS weaknesses and impending certificate expiry further elevate the risk of data interception. While email security and network security are strong points, foundational improvements in data protection and governance are urgently needed. Addressing these issues will reduce legal exposure, improve customer trust, and strengthen overall cyber resilience. Immediate remediation efforts should focus on compliance frameworks and critical security controls to align with industry best practices and regulatory mandates.

C

Crow Holdings

tcr.com

0

The website's overall security posture shows no critical vulnerabilities but reveals significant gaps in compliance and security best practices, especially in GDPR adherence and NIS2 regulatory requirements. While network and email security are strong, key deficiencies such as missing security headers, weak SSL configurations, and absent incident response and security policies pose material risks. The lack of a Content-Security-Policy header and weak SSL key length expose the business to potential data breaches and man-in-the-middle attacks. GDPR non-compliance, including missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, exposes the organization to regulatory fines and reputational damage. The absence of an information security framework and incident response procedures under NIS2 indicates immature cybersecurity governance. Addressing these issues will improve legal compliance, reduce risk exposure, and strengthen customer trust. Immediate remediation will also help avoid costly disruptions and penalties while supporting sustainable security management practices.

C

Consensus Sales, LLC

goconsensus.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium severity vulnerabilities that require urgent attention. Key gaps exist in security headers, GDPR compliance, and especially in adherence to NIS2 requirements, indicating insufficient information security governance and incident response preparedness. Missing Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy headers expose the site to client-side attacks, while the absence of a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy documentation risk regulatory non-compliance and potential fines. SSL/TLS and network security are strong areas, but upcoming certificate expiry and missing DNSSEC present risks to data integrity and trust. Email security shows room for improvement with missing DKIM signatures, which could affect email authenticity. Addressing these issues will strengthen both the technical defenses and regulatory compliance, reducing the risk of data breaches, reputational damage, and legal penalties.

O

OneTrust, LLC

cookiebanners.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues detected, but several high and medium risks require urgent attention. Key weaknesses lie in compliance areas, particularly GDPR and NIS2 regulatory frameworks, with missing privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and essential security documentation. Email security configurations are incomplete, exposing the organization to phishing and spoofing risks. SSL/TLS implementations have vulnerabilities that could compromise data confidentiality and integrity. While network security is strong, missing security headers and weak configurations reduce protection against certain web-based attacks. Immediate remediation will not only improve security but also ensure regulatory compliance, reducing potential legal and reputational risks. Addressing these issues will strengthen customer trust and safeguard business continuity. Proactive security governance and incident response planning are currently insufficient and should be prioritized.

D

DiscoverOrg

discoverorg.com

0

The website exhibits a concerning security posture with no critical issues but multiple high and medium-risk findings, indicating significant gaps in foundational security controls. Key deficiencies include missing essential HTTP security headers, weak SSL/TLS configurations, and inadequate GDPR compliance measures, exposing the business to data breaches and regulatory penalties. The absence of a formal information security framework, incident response, and business continuity plans further increases operational risk and vulnerability to cyber incidents. While email and network security are strong, critical areas like web security headers, SSL/TLS, and compliance require urgent attention to protect sensitive user data and maintain customer trust. DNS security is relatively robust but can be improved with additional configurations. Addressing these issues will reduce the risk of exploitation, improve regulatory compliance, and strengthen overall resilience. Prioritizing governance, technical controls, and privacy policies will provide the best risk reduction and business value.

S

Spotify AB

spotifyforbrands.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate to weak security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium severity findings that could expose the business to significant risks. Key gaps include missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance elements such as cookie policies and consent mechanisms, and absence of foundational NIS2 security governance documentation. Email and network security are relatively strong, but SSL/TLS configurations show weaknesses that could undermine data integrity and confidentiality. The absence of incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies increases the risk of prolonged breaches and reputational damage. Overall, the organization faces regulatory compliance risks, potential data breaches, and operational disruptions if these issues remain unaddressed. Immediate remediation will enhance customer trust, reduce legal exposure, and improve resilience against cyber threats. Prioritizing governance and technical controls will strengthen the security framework and align with industry best practices.

N

Nelson Recruiting

nelsonrecruiting.com

0

The website's overall security posture is currently weak, with critical gaps in network security and compliance frameworks, exposing the business to significant operational and reputational risks. Critical services like MySQL and PostgreSQL are publicly accessible, creating immediate vulnerabilities to data breaches. The absence of key security headers and missing incident response and security policies further increase the risk of exploitation and regulatory non-compliance. GDPR compliance is insufficient, lacking essential cookie policies and consent mechanisms, potentially leading to legal penalties. Although email security and TLS configurations show moderate strength, critical certificates and security policies require urgent updating. The NIS2 and network security scores are alarmingly low, indicating inadequate protection against cyber threats and lack of preparedness for incidents. Immediate remediation across network exposure, compliance documentation, and security headers is essential to safeguard the business and maintain customer trust. Without prompt action, the organization faces heightened risks of cyberattacks, data loss, and regulatory fines.

A

Acentra Health

acentra.com

0

The website's overall security posture reveals significant gaps in compliance and foundational security controls, particularly concerning regulatory requirements and cryptographic protections. While no critical vulnerabilities were found, multiple high and medium severity issues pose material risks to data privacy, legal compliance, and customer trust. Key weaknesses include missing security headers, lack of GDPR-compliant cookie policies and consent mechanisms, absence of formal information security and incident response frameworks, and weak SSL/TLS configurations. Conversely, network security and DNS health show relatively strong scores, indicating some effective controls are in place. The deficient NIS2 compliance score highlights the urgent need for documented security policies and incident handling procedures. Immediate remediation will reduce exposure to data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Investment in security governance and cryptographic standards is needed to align with industry best practices and legal mandates.

R

RealPage

yieldstar.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected but several high and medium-severity issues that could expose the business to regulatory risks and cyber threats. Notably, the absence of essential security headers and weak encryption practices increase susceptibility to common web attacks such as clickjacking and data interception. GDPR compliance gaps, including missing cookie consent and incomplete privacy policies, pose significant legal and reputational risks, especially in markets regulated by data protection laws. The lack of a formal information security framework, policy documentation, and incident response procedures highlights a critical deficiency in organizational security governance. While network security and email security perform relatively well, weaknesses in SSL key strength and DNS configurations undermine overall trustworthiness. Addressing these issues promptly will not only enhance security resilience but also support regulatory compliance and customer confidence. A prioritized, strategic approach focusing on governance, encryption, and compliance will provide the most business value. Continuous monitoring and improvement are essential to maintaining and advancing the security posture over time.

R

RealPage, Inc.

realpagelumina.com

0

The website's overall security posture reveals significant gaps, particularly in governance and compliance areas. Critical issues such as the lack of email authentication and missing incident response procedures expose the business to heightened risks of phishing attacks and prolonged downtime during security incidents. High-severity findings around GDPR compliance and the absence of a documented security framework indicate potential regulatory and reputational risks. Although network security and DNS health scores are strong, foundational security controls like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security headers are insufficiently configured, increasing vulnerability to web-based attacks. Expiring SSL certificates and mixed content issues further degrade trust and security. Immediate remediation is necessary to safeguard sensitive data, ensure regulatory compliance, and protect brand reputation. The business should prioritize establishing formal security policies and improving critical headers and email authentication measures. Addressing these issues will reduce risk exposure and support long-term resilience against evolving cyber threats.

F

Freddie Mac

freddiemac.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally solid technical security foundation with no critical vulnerabilities detected and strong scores in email security, network security, SSL/TLS, and DNS health. However, significant gaps exist in regulatory compliance and governance, particularly regarding GDPR and NIS2 mandates, which present substantial legal and operational risks. The absence of essential policies such as cookie consent, incident response, and security frameworks exposes the organization to potential regulatory penalties and undermines customer trust. Missing key security headers and mixed content issues indicate areas where the website’s resilience against common web attacks can be improved. While foundational network and protocol configurations are strong, the low scores in compliance reflect a need for urgent attention to documentation, privacy, and incident management. Overall, the security posture is functional but incomplete, with business-critical exposure due to compliance shortcomings. Addressing these gaps will enhance legal compliance, customer confidence, and incident readiness, thereby reducing potential financial and reputational damage.

F

Fannie Mae

fanniemae.com

0

The website demonstrates a mixed security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium-risk issues that could impact both security and regulatory compliance. Notably, the absence of key GDPR-related elements such as Privacy and Cookie Policies, and a consent banner, exposes the business to potential legal penalties and loss of user trust. Security headers are inadequately configured, increasing susceptibility to common web attacks like cross-site scripting. The lacking information security framework and incident response procedures indicate immature cybersecurity governance, risking delayed or ineffective handling of security incidents. SSL certificate expiration and mixed content issues threaten secure communications, while missing DNSSEC and email authentication elements could allow domain spoofing or phishing attacks. Positively, network security and DNS health are strong, providing a solid foundation. Overall, immediate focus on compliance and security policy establishment is critical to safeguard business operations and reputation.

D

DotLoop LLC

dotloop.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally strong network and email security posture, with high scores in networkSecurity (100/100) and emailSecurity (95/100). However, significant gaps exist in compliance and governance areas, particularly related to GDPR and NIS2 regulations, where scores are notably low (43/100 and 25/100 respectively). Critical business risks stem from missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, lack of information security frameworks, and absent incident response and business continuity plans. Security headers are partially implemented but lack essential protections like Content-Security-Policy, increasing exposure to web-based attacks. SSL/TLS configurations are good overall but require timely certificate renewal and improved HSTS settings. DNS health is solid but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC. Addressing these deficiencies is crucial to mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks, protect customer data, and ensure operational resilience against security incidents.

O

Osano, Inc.

trusthub.com

0

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected and strong scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, significant gaps exist in compliance-related areas, notably GDPR and NIS2 regulatory requirements, which expose the business to legal and operational risks. Missing cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and privacy policy issues create potential non-compliance liabilities under data protection laws. Additionally, the absence of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and security contact information undermines the organization's ability to effectively manage security incidents and regulatory audits. Security headers are partially implemented but lack key protections, increasing the risk of clickjacking and cross-site scripting. Email security is reasonably well configured but can be improved with DKIM and DMARC enhancements. DNS security is good but would benefit from enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records to prevent unauthorized certificate issuance. Overall, the company should prioritize compliance maturity and governance to reduce business risk while reinforcing technical controls.

A

Aryeo

aryeo.com

0

The website demonstrates several significant security gaps that could expose the business to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. While there are no critical vulnerabilities, the presence of multiple high and medium severity issues in security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulatory adherence, and SSL/TLS configuration indicate an urgent need for remediation. The low scores in security headers (30/100), GDPR (43/100), and especially NIS2 (25/100) highlight weaknesses in both technical controls and governance practices. Email security and network security are relatively strong, reducing some exposure to phishing and network-based attacks. However, the absence of key policies and procedures, such as incident response and vulnerability disclosure, leaves the organization ill-prepared for security events. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms also risks non-compliance fines under data protection laws. Overall, the organization should prioritize strengthening foundational security controls and compliance frameworks to protect customer data and maintain trust.

C

Contentful

contentfulstatus.com

0

The website exhibits significant security gaps, particularly in compliance, email security, and incident management frameworks, which pose substantial risks to business operations and regulatory adherence. Critical and high severity issues, such as the absence of email authentication and missing key security headers, expose the organization to phishing attacks, data breaches, and clickjacking vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is notably weak, with no cookie policy or consent mechanism, risking regulatory fines and eroding customer trust. The lack of documented information security and incident response policies under NIS2 directives indicates unpreparedness for cyber incidents, threatening operational resilience. Although network security and SSL/TLS configurations show strengths, weaknesses in DNS security and HTTP security headers reduce overall protection. Addressing these issues promptly will reduce exposure to cyber threats, improve regulatory compliance, and enhance customer confidence. Prioritizing governance and technical controls will support sustainable security posture improvements. Incremental remediation aligned with business priorities is essential to mitigate risks effectively.

Z

Zillow Group

zillowgroup.com

0

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues found, but several high and medium severity gaps that pose significant risks. Key vulnerabilities include missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures such as cookie policy and consent mechanisms, and absence of comprehensive security governance aligned with NIS2 requirements. While network security and email security are strong, deficiencies in incident response, security policy documentation, and vulnerability disclosure processes expose the business to operational and regulatory risks. The presence of mixed content and weak HSTS configurations could lead to data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Non-compliance with GDPR and NIS2 frameworks may result in regulatory penalties and damage to brand reputation. Immediate remediation will reduce exposure to cyber threats and enhance customer trust. Overall, addressing these gaps is critical to aligning security practices with business continuity and regulatory expectations.