Skip to main content

Security Directory

Explore comprehensive security analyses from websites around the world. Filter by industry, location, risk level, and more.

Live Guard activity

Security teams are checking their sites with Guard right now

Run your domain before the queue fills up

0
Websites
0
Industries
0
Countries
0
Avg Score
Page 484 of 516|Showing 24151-24200 of 25766
D

Security Verification

doormotion.ie

0
OtherIrelandsmallHIGH

The website doormotion.ie currently serves a security verification page that uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to verify visitors are not bots. This indicates the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or similar bot protection mechanism blocking direct access to the site's actual content. Due to this, no business information, contact details, or policies are accessible for analysis. The visible page is minimal, containing only a loading spinner and an invisible captcha form, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or compliance posture. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. However, there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data, which are critical for secure web operations. The page's performance and mobile optimization are basic, and SEO metadata is minimal. The lack of visible privacy or cookie policies and absence of contact information further reduce the site's trustworthiness and compliance standing. From a security perspective, the use of Google reCAPTCHA is a positive control to prevent automated abuse, but the absence of HTTPS and security headers is a concern. The inability to access the actual site content due to the WAF challenge means that a full security and compliance evaluation cannot be performed. Overall, the site currently presents a low trust profile and limited transparency. Strategically, it is recommended to ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced, security headers are implemented, and that privacy and cookie policies are published and accessible. Additionally, providing clear business and contact information will improve credibility and compliance. Until the WAF challenge is resolved or bypassed for analysis, the site's full capabilities and compliance cannot be assessed.

15
-
-
70
-
75
100
securitycaptchabotprotectionwaf
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
2025-06-22T09:00:05.739Z
cortsite.com favicon

CORT Ltd & CORTBase Ltd

cortsite.com

0
OtherIrelandsmallHIGH

CORT Ltd and CORTBase Ltd operate the website cortsite.com, providing specialized legal software solutions primarily targeting solicitors and legal professionals in Ireland. Their key offerings include case management, legal accounts, and requisitions on title software, supported by over 30 years of expertise in the legal sector. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to their niche market. The business model focuses on software product sales and licensing with accompanying support services. Technically, the website employs a Bootstrap-based responsive design with jQuery, Font Awesome, and Jssor Slider for interactive elements. While the site uses HTTPS with a Sectigo SSL certificate and includes some anti-spam measures in forms, it lacks modern security headers and uses an older jQuery version, which may pose security risks. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism and has no visible terms of service or incident response information. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good baseline practices such as HTTPS and SSL trust seals but could improve by activating reCAPTCHA, upgrading libraries, and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy, though cookie policy and GDPR-specific disclosures could be enhanced. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected. Overall, cortsite.com is a credible and professionally maintained website serving a specialized legal software market. Strategic improvements in security hardening, privacy transparency, and technical modernization would further strengthen its posture and trustworthiness.

15
28
13
85
-
80
20
legalsoftwarecasemanagementlegalaccountsrequisitionsontitlesolicitors+1 more
Bootstrap 3.3.1jQuery 1.11.3 and 2.1.3Font Awesome 4.3.0Google reCAPTCHA+2
2025-06-22T09:00:04.765Z
A

404 Not Found

act.eu

0
OtherN/asmallCRITICAL

The website at act.eu is currently inaccessible, serving a standard 404 Not Found error page with no substantive content. The page is hosted on an Apache server over HTTP without HTTPS encryption, indicating a lack of basic security measures. There are no visible metadata, structured data, forms, contact information, or social media links, which severely limits the ability to assess the business or technical maturity of the site. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies further suggests the site is either under development or abandoned. From a technical perspective, the site lacks modern web technologies, security headers, and performance optimizations. The lack of HTTPS and security headers exposes visitors to potential risks. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating minimal digital marketing or user tracking. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and absence of security best practices. The site does not provide any compliance or incident response information. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategically, the site requires urgent remediation to implement HTTPS, restore or develop meaningful content, add privacy and cookie policies, and improve security headers. Without these improvements, the site poses a risk to users and fails to establish trust or credibility.

15
-
-
70
-
55
20
2025-06-22T09:00:04.580Z
O

Request Rejected

ostiasolutions.com

0
OtherN/asmallHIGH

The website ostiasolutions.com is currently inaccessible due to a security block or Web Application Firewall (WAF) mechanism, as evidenced by the minimal HTML content displaying a 'Request Rejected' message. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, technical, or security information. The lack of accessible content indicates that the site is either protected by a security service or misconfigured, resulting in a denial of access. Consequently, no metadata, forms, contact details, or policies are available for analysis. From a technical perspective, the absence of accessible content and metadata means the website's infrastructure, technology stack, and performance characteristics cannot be assessed. Similarly, no security headers or SSL configuration details are available, preventing evaluation of the site's security posture. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture cannot be positively assessed due to the blocking mechanism, but the presence of a WAF or similar security control indicates some level of protection. However, the inability to access the site content severely limits trust and business credibility assessments. Strategic recommendations focus on resolving access issues to enable proper analysis and ensuring the implementation of standard security and privacy best practices once accessible.

35
25
5
85
-
60
100
2025-06-22T09:00:04.334Z
M

moneydoctor.ie

moneydoctor.ie

0
OtherN/asmallHIGH

The website moneydoctor.ie currently serves as a parked domain with no active business content. It embeds an iframe pointing to a parked domain page hosted by names.co.uk, indicating that the domain is not in active use for a commercial or informational website. There is no visible metadata, structured data, or business information present on the site. The lack of privacy policies, contact information, or terms of service further confirms the site is inactive or placeholder. From a technical perspective, the site is minimal with no scripts, no CMS detected, and no modern web technologies in use. The iframe embedding an external parked domain page suggests the hosting is provided by names.co.uk. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers are evident from the provided data. Security posture is very weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any form of data protection or incident response information. The site does not collect user data or provide forms, which limits exposure but also indicates no active business operations. The domain's WHOIS data was not provided, so domain legitimacy and registration consistency cannot be assessed. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. It is effectively a placeholder domain with no active presence or trust indicators. Strategic recommendations include securing the domain with HTTPS, adding business and contact information, implementing privacy and cookie policies, and developing meaningful content to establish credibility and compliance.

15
-
5
70
-
65
100
parked-domainplaceholdernoindexiframe
2025-06-22T09:00:03.889Z
C

Default Web Site Page

corporatelife.ie

0
OtherN/asmallCRITICAL

The website corporatelife.ie currently displays a default cPanel error page indicating that the site is inaccessible due to server misconfiguration or DNS/IP address issues. No actual business content, branding, or services are presented, making it impossible to assess the company's market position or offerings. The only contact information available is a generic webmaster email address likely related to hosting support. From a technical perspective, the site is hosted on a cPanel environment with Apache server technology. The page is mobile responsive but lacks any meaningful content or SEO optimization. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL configuration, and no security headers or policies are present. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected. The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any published security or incident response policies. The site is effectively non-functional for end users, which poses a significant risk to business credibility and trust. Without proper configuration and content restoration, the site cannot serve its intended purpose. Overall, the site is currently non-operational and presents critical risks related to accessibility, security, and compliance. Immediate remediation is required to restore service, secure the site with HTTPS, and publish necessary policies to meet basic compliance and trust standards.

15
-
-
55
-
80
20
errorcpaneldefaultpageservermisconfigurationdnsissues
ApachecPanel
2025-06-22T09:00:03.608Z
B

ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

beaumont.org

0
OtherN/asmallHIGH

The website at beaumont.org is currently inaccessible due to a 403 error generated by Amazon CloudFront, indicating that the request was blocked possibly due to traffic or configuration issues. As a result, no meaningful content, metadata, or business information could be extracted or analyzed. The lack of accessible content prevents assessment of the company's market position, services, or technical infrastructure. The security posture cannot be evaluated beyond the detection of the CloudFront WAF blocking the request, which itself indicates some level of security control but also a critical availability issue. From a technical perspective, the site is hosted behind Amazon CloudFront, a reputable CDN and WAF provider, but the current configuration or traffic conditions are preventing access. No information about SSL/TLS configuration, security headers, or technology stack is available due to the blocked content. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor are there any contact details or forms. Security-wise, the site is effectively unavailable, which is a critical issue for user trust and business operations. The blocking by CloudFront suggests some security measures are in place, but the inability to access the site severely limits any further security or compliance evaluation. There is no evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but this is due to lack of access rather than confirmed security. Overall, the site currently presents a high risk due to unavailability and lack of accessible information. Strategic recommendations include resolving the CloudFront configuration or traffic issues to restore access, implementing comprehensive security headers and SSL, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear contact and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.

15
25
-
85
-
70
100
2025-06-22T08:59:45.468Z