Skip to main content

Is architectsjournal.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - The Architects’ Journal

architectsjournal.co.uk Security Report Summary

architectsjournal.co.uk received a security score of 65 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers The Architects’ Journal's website security posture. The Architects’ Journal operates in the Media industry in United Kingdom.

The Architects’ Journal is a well-established UK-based media publication focused on architecture news, building reviews, practice insights, and architectural competitions. It serves a professional audience including architects, students, and industry stakeholders. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and offers a rich content experience supported by structured data and SEO best practices. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms such as Google Tag Manager, Adobe Analytics, and Optimizely. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies in the provided content. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules, which slightly reduces trust but does not detract from the site's legitimacy based on content and technical indicators.

The security scan identified 30 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google AdSense, Adobe Analytics, Optimizely, FooBox Image Lightbox, Slick Slider, Yoast SEO plugin.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

architectsjournal.co.uk favicon

Is architectsjournal.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for The Architects’ Journal

https://architectsjournal.co.uk

Check if architectsjournal.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Kingdommedium
WordPress 6.8.1jQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle AdSenseAdobe Analytics+4 more
Analyzed 10/24/2025Completed 9:18:16 AM6mo ago
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Media avg (58)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for architectsjournal.co.uk

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainarchitectsjournal.co.uk
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The Architects’ Journal is a well-established UK-based media publication focused on architecture news, building reviews, practice insights, and architectural competitions. It serves a professional audience including architects, students, and industry stakeholders. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and offers a rich content experience supported by structured data and SEO best practices. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms such as Google Tag Manager, Adobe Analytics, and Optimizely. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies in the provided content. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules, which slightly reduces trust but does not detract from the site's legitimacy based on content and technical indicators.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.1jQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle AdSenseAdobe AnalyticsOptimizelyFooBox Image LightboxSlick SliderYoast SEO plugin

9 urgent findings need attention

9 high

  • + 1 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep architectsjournal.co.uk under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for architectsjournal.co.uk.

Security Headers

4 findings

65/100

GDPR Compliance

2 findings

70/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

4 findings

75/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Architects’ Journal operates in the media sector, targeting architecture professionals and enthusiasts. Its business model revolves around content publishing, advertising, events, and competitions. The site is part of EMAP, a known media group, which enhances its market position. The presence of multiple partner domains related to awards and events indicates a broad partnership ecosystem. The site leverages extensive analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and monetization. Growth indicators include active event promotion and diversified content categories. The lack of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on digital engagement rather than direct sales or support.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable analytics and advertising services loaded asynchronously to reduce risk. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site includes a cookie check mechanism but lacks a visible cookie consent banner or privacy policy, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Architects’ Journal

Description:

Up to the minute architecture news, including building reviews, insight on running a successful practice and the latest architectural competitions.

Key Services:
Architecture newsBuilding reviewsPractice insightsArchitectural competitionsEvents and awards
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.1jQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle AdSenseAdobe AnalyticsOptimizelyFooBox Image LightboxSlick SliderYoast SEO plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Adobe Analytics with async loading
  • Cookie check and redirect if cookies disabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsAdobe AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerOptimizely
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseGoogle DoubleClickGoogle Ad Manager
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagAdobe AnalyticsOptimizely
Marketing Tools:
Site Kit by GoogleGetSiteControl
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional architecture news and media platform

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the architectsjournal.co.uk security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; preload"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete architectsjournal.co.uk security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mktomail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc.collector.reports@emap.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc.collector.forensics@emap.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Potential Subdomain Takeover

HIGH

Subdomain staging.architectsjournal.co.uk points to unregistered service dix12ey62fi9j.cloudfront.net

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(122 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:54.154.249.39, 52.214.241.53
Name Servers:
ns-1181.awsdns-19.orgDNS only
ns-1956.awsdns-52.co.ukDNS only
ns-755.awsdns-30.netDNS only
ns-97.awsdns-12.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: architectsjournal-co-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mktomail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does architectsjournal.co.uk compare?

See how architectsjournal.co.uk stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1 and uses a variety of modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Analytics, and Optimizely for A/B testing. It employs multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript libraries for responsive design and interactive features. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. There is some technical debt in the form of missing security headers and incomplete privacy documentation, which should be addressed to maintain compliance and security.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the architectsjournal.co.uk report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainarchitectsjournal.co.uk
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the architectsjournal.co.uk report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about architectsjournal.co.uk

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website