Is architectural-review.com Safe? Security Analysis for The Architectural Review
https://architectural-review.comCheck if architectural-review.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
Above Media avg (58)
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for architectural-review.com
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
The Architectural Review is a well-established global architecture magazine with a history dating back to 1896. It offers incisive critiques and international design content through online and print media. The website serves architects, designers, and enthusiasts with articles, competitions, podcasts, and newsletters. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies and integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising services. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security best practices, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern but does not outweigh the professional presentation and social media presence. Overall, the site is credible and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact information.
Detected Technologies
8 urgent findings need attention
8 high
Keep architectural-review.com under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
4 findings
65/100
GDPR Compliance
1 finding
85/100
NIS2 Compliance
8 findings
17/100
Email Security
4 findings
75/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The Architectural Review holds a strong market position as a niche media publication in architecture and design. Its business model revolves around content publishing, subscriptions, and sales of magazine issues via an official store. The company leverages partnerships for advertising and marketing, evident from integrated Google and social media tools. The target audience is specialized professionals and enthusiasts in architecture. Growth indicators include active content updates, competitions, and multimedia offerings. The parent company is Emap, a known media group. The website's digital maturity is moderate with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms. Multiple security headers are either missing or not explicitly declared, which could be improved to harden the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses several third-party scripts which require regular auditing to prevent supply chain risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with explicit policies and headers.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
The Architectural Review
An online and print magazine about international design. Since 1896.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of reCAPTCHA v3
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional media publication focused on architecture.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the architectural-review.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=15552000; preload"
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete architectural-review.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Potential Subdomain Takeover
HIGHSubdomain staging.architectural-review.com points to unregistered service dxeiyfs8iine1.cloudfront.net
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does architectural-review.com compare?
See how architectural-review.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the architectural-review.com report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Scan your own website
Liked the architectural-review.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about architectural-review.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published