Skip to main content

Is compared.edu.au a Scam? Security Check Results - QILT

compared.edu.au Security Report Summary

compared.edu.au received a security score of 72 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers QILT's website security posture. QILT operates in the Education industry in Australia.

ComparED is an Australian Government initiative powered by QILT that provides prospective students with tools to explore and compare higher education institutions and study areas based on real student experiences and graduate employment outcomes. The website serves as a trusted public information platform to support informed study choices. Technically, the site is built as a modern Angular single-page application leveraging Materialize CSS and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though it lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. WHOIS data is privacy protected and minimal, which is typical for .edu.au domains and justified given the government affiliation. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

The security scan identified 25 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Angular 5.2.11, Materialize CSS 1.0.0-beta, jQuery Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

compared.edu.au favicon

Is compared.edu.au Safe? Security Analysis for QILT

https://compared.edu.au

Check if compared.edu.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationAustraliamedium
Angular 5.2.11Materialize CSS 1.0.0-betajQuery Slick CarouselGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/7/2025Completed 11:18:32 AM8mo ago
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Education avg (55)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for compared.edu.au

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domaincompared.edu.au
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

ComparED is an Australian Government initiative powered by QILT that provides prospective students with tools to explore and compare higher education institutions and study areas based on real student experiences and graduate employment outcomes. The website serves as a trusted public information platform to support informed study choices. Technically, the site is built as a modern Angular single-page application leveraging Materialize CSS and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though it lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. WHOIS data is privacy protected and minimal, which is typical for .edu.au domains and justified given the government affiliation. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

Angular 5.2.11Materialize CSS 1.0.0-betajQuery Slick CarouselGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar

7 urgent findings need attention

7 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep compared.edu.au under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for compared.edu.au.

Security Headers

3 findings

80/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

53/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

1 finding

100/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche as an official government-backed educational comparison tool, providing unique value through access to QILT survey data covering over 2 million students and graduates. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and transparency in higher education quality indicators. The target audience is prospective Australian higher education students seeking data-driven insights. The site benefits from strong government endorsement and partnerships, enhancing credibility and market position. While direct revenue streams are not applicable, the platform supports government education policy and student decision-making. The technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security policies and privacy compliance improvements. The partnership ecosystem includes QILT and the Australian Government, with no detected subsidiaries or commercial partners.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the source code. The site lacks a published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are recommended for transparency and trust. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the public content. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could improve by adopting additional security best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

QILT

Description:

ComparED is a government initiative powered by QILT that allows users to explore and compare higher education institutions and study areas based on real-life student experiences and graduate employment outcomes.

Key Services:
Institution and study area comparisonAccess to QILT survey reportsStudent experience and graduate employment data
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Angular 5.2.11Materialize CSS 1.0.0-betajQuery Slick CarouselGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar
Frameworks:
Angular
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure external analytics and tracking

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the compared.edu.au security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete compared.edu.au security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default0
Selector:google0
Selector:k10
Selector:selector10
Selector:selector20
Selector:mail0
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email
Forensic Reports:dmarc@employment.gov.au
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:13.248.165.164
Name Servers:
dns1.ssc.gov.auWHOIS only
dns2.ssc.gov.auWHOIS only
ext-dns1.ssc.gov.auDNS only
ext-dns2.ssc.gov.auDNS only
SOA:Serial: 26, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:368ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does compared.edu.au compare?

See how compared.edu.au stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern Angular 5.2.11 framework with Materialize CSS for styling and jQuery Slick for carousel functionality. It is a single-page application with client-side routing. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility is basic but present, with skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site does not use a traditional CMS but appears custom-built. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit privacy consent mechanisms, which could impact compliance and security posture.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the compared.edu.au report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domaincompared.edu.au
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the compared.edu.au report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about compared.edu.au

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website