Skip to main content

Is constructions.ee a Scam? Security Check Results

constructions.ee Security Report Summary

constructions.ee received a security score of 36 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Potentially Unsafe". constructions.ee operates in the Other industry in Estonia.

The website constructions.ee currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The domain is registered since 2017 with NETIM and uses name servers consistent with the hosting region. The visible page shows outdated CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. No business, contact, privacy, or cookie policy information is available on the accessible page, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or compliance. The site includes a security check powered by BitNinja, suggesting some level of security awareness but also indicating potential exposure to threats. Overall, the website's digital maturity is low, with poor content quality and minimal technical sophistication.

The security scan identified 32 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: JavaScript.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

C

Is constructions.ee Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

http://constructions.ee

Check if constructions.ee is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherEstoniasmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 6/27/2025Completed 12:55:51 AM9mo ago
36
Security Score
HIGH RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for constructions.ee

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainconstructions.ee
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The website constructions.ee currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The domain is registered since 2017 with NETIM and uses name servers consistent with the hosting region. The visible page shows outdated CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. No business, contact, privacy, or cookie policy information is available on the accessible page, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or compliance. The site includes a security check powered by BitNinja, suggesting some level of security awareness but also indicating potential exposure to threats. Overall, the website's digital maturity is low, with poor content quality and minimal technical sophistication.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

15 urgent findings need attention

4 critical · 11 high

  • + 7 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep constructions.ee under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for constructions.ee.

Security Headers

7 findings

20/100

GDPR Compliance

5 findings

0/100

NIS2 Compliance

10 findings

0/100

Email Security

3 findings

85/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, it is difficult to ascertain the company's market positioning, business model, or target audience. The domain age suggests a small business possibly operating in Estonia, but no clear sector or services are described. The presence of Joomla and WordPress CMS hints at a typical small business or personal site setup. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of contact details and policies reduces credibility and trustworthiness.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the use of outdated CMS versions with known vulnerabilities and the absence of security headers or HTTPS confirmation. The presence of a WAF or security challenge page is a positive indicator of some protective measures but also suggests prior exposure to attacks or automated threats. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no GDPR-related policies or consent mechanisms visible.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all CMS platforms to their latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security challenge page with automatic redirect and browser integrity check, indicating WAF or security protection blocking direct content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Browser integrity check script present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security challenge page likely from a WAF.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the constructions.ee security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

0/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

NIS2 requires appropriate technical measures including encryption

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete constructions.ee security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.206 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:212.7.207.89 ip4:95.168.166.52 include:spf.protection.outlook.com +ip4:83.149.73.233 +ip4:37.48.121.23 +ip4:37.48.121.30 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

No HTTPS Encryption

CRITICAL

Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:83.149.95.206
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lv
ns2.areait.lv
ns3.areait.lv
MX Records:
0: constructions-ee.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025051601, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.206 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:212.7.207.89 ip4:95.168.166.52 include:spf.protection.outlook.com +ip4:83.149.73.233 +ip4:37.48.121.23 +ip4:37.48.121.30 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does constructions.ee compare?

constructions.ee scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are outdated and unsupported, posing significant security risks. The page includes JavaScript-based browser integrity checks and an automatic redirect form, typical of WAF challenge pages. No modern analytics, tracking, or marketing tools are detected. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is likely slow due to the blocking challenge and outdated tech stack. Mobile optimization is basic, and the overall technical implementation is poor.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the constructions.ee report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainconstructions.ee
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Want OffSeq to fix this?

Book a 30-minute remediation call

Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.

OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services

Scan your own website

Liked the constructions.ee report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about constructions.ee

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website