What is the security status of defectivebydesign.org?

defectivebydesign.org has a security score of 60/100, rated as Moderate Risk. The website may have security concerns that should be addressed.

Is defectivebydesign.org safe to use?

Our security scan shows defectivebydesign.org is Moderate Risk. SSL security issues detected. Always practice safe browsing habits.

Does defectivebydesign.org have viruses?

Our comprehensive security scan analyzes multiple security factors. Based on the overall security score of 60/100, the website is rated as Moderate Risk. However, websites can change over time, so always use updated security software.

What is defectivebydesign.org's trust score?

defectivebydesign.org has a security score of 60/100. This score is based on multiple factors including SSL security, security headers, DNS health, and compliance checks.

I want to know if defectivebydesign.org is a legitimate website or if it's a scam.

According to our comprehensive security analysis, defectivebydesign.org has a security score of 60/100, which indicates it is Moderate Risk. Defective by Design is a grassroots campaign operated by the Free Software Foundation, focused on opposing Digital Rights Management (DRM) technologies that restrict user freedoms. The website serves as an advocacy platform providing educational content, action alerts, and fundraising opportunities to support their mission. Their market position is niche within the free software and digital rights community, targeting computer users and activists concerned with digital freedom. The business model is non-profit and donation-driven, emphasizing transparency and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with jQuery and Flexslider for UI components, and uses Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. However, the CMS version is somewhat dated, which may pose future maintenance and security challenges. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy exists but is hosted on a related FSF domain, and no cookie consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification, but the affiliation with the Free Software Foundation and consistent content supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its advocacy mission. Strategic improvements include adding a cookie policy with consent, publishing security and incident response information, and enhancing security headers to strengthen the security posture and privacy compliance.

Is defectivebydesign.org Safe? Security Analysis for Free Software Foundation, Inc.

https://defectivebydesign.org

Check if defectivebydesign.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/asmall

Drupal 7jQueryFlexsliderMatomo Analytics

Analyzed 10/8/2025Completed 10:58:22 PM

Security Score

MEDIUM RISK

Exclusive insights unlocked

Unlock the complete security report for defectivebydesign.org

Get full access to AI recommendations, compliance evidence, vulnerability remediation steps, and downloadable PDF reports. Upgrade once for lifetime access to this scan.

Full Report Access

All modules, AI insights, PDF download

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

How it works

Enter your email to receive the unlocked report.
Complete the secure EveryPay checkout (cards & local methods supported).
You’ll receive an email with your unique unlock code and the PDF export.

Delivery email

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domaindefectivebydesign.org

Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

I have read and agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.I acknowledge the Returns & Refunds policy and understand the digital delivery terms.

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Defective by Design is a grassroots campaign operated by the Free Software Foundation, focused on opposing Digital Rights Management (DRM) technologies that restrict user freedoms. The website serves as an advocacy platf… Unlock the full Guard report to read the complete analysis.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 7jQueryFlexsliderMatomo Analytics

Security Headers

3 findings

80/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

53/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

5 findings

60/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Snapshot shown below. Unlock the full AI report for complete market insights, audience profiling, and step-by-step recommendations.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Defective by Design operates as a focused non-profit campaign under the Free Software Foundation umbrella, leveraging the FSF's reputation and resources. Its competitive advantage lies in its clear mission against DRM and its integration with the broader free software movement. Revenue streams are primarily donations, supported by merchandise sales and fundraising campaigns. The target audience includes digital rights activists, free software users, and privacy-conscious individuals. The campaign maintains active communication through blogs and social media, fostering community engagement. Partnerships with FSF and GNU projects enhance credibility and outreach. Growth indicators include ongoing blog updates and fundraising efforts. The campaign's operations are transparent and aligned with non-profit advocacy best practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms use secure POST methods. The use of Matomo analytics reflects a privacy-conscious approach. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could delay response to security incidents. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit advocacy site but could be improved with additional controls and disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

Upgrade to the full Guard report to access tailored remediation steps.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

A preview of your strategic observations is visible. Upgrade to unlock the full competitive positioning, trust signals, and branding checklist.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Description:

Defective by Design is a participatory grassroots campaign working to eliminate DRM (Digital Rights Management) as a threat to innovation, privacy, and user freedom in digital media and software.

Key Services:

Campaigning against DRMProviding information and guides on DRM-free alternativesMobilizing activism and action alertsFundraising through donations

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:

Drupal 7jQueryFlexsliderMatomo Analytics

Frameworks:

Drupal

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:

85/100

Best Practices:

HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Secure forms with POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Services:

Matomo

Tracking Level:minimal

Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:

Matomo

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good

User Experience:good

Content Relevance:good

Navigation Clarity:good

Professionalism:good

Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Some header findings are shown. Unlock to see the full checklist, impacted endpoints, and remediation guidance.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100

Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended) Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

You can see headline NIS2 checks. Upgrade to access the full control mapping, severity breakdown, and remediation plan.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100

Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Quick view of email authentication checks is provided. Unlock to uncover full DNS evidence, record diffs, and fix scripts.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100

Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none" Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

SPF

Sender Policy Framework

DKIM

DomainKeys Identified Mail

DMARC

Domain-based Message Authentication

MX Records

Mail Exchange Records

BIMI

Brand Indicators

MTA-STS

Mail Transfer Agent Security

TLS-RPT

TLS Reporting

DNSSEC

DNS Security

SPF Details

Record:

v=spf1 redirect=gnu.org

DNS Lookups:0/10

DMARC Details

Policy:none

Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@fsf.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

This is a teaser of the TLS audit. Unlock to view certificate chains, cipher support tables, and remediation steps.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100

Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Certificate Details

Subject:dbd1p.fsf.org

Issuer:R11

Valid Until:11/8/2025 (30 days)

SANs:boycottsony.org, dayagainstdrm.org, dbd.fsf.org +11 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

Unlock the full DNS posture audit to reveal misconfigurations, zone records, and actionable fixes.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100

Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

DNS Records

A Records:209.51.188.152

AAAA Records:2001:470:142::152

Name Servers:

ns1.gnu.orgDNS only

ns2.gnu.orgDNS only

ns4.gnu.orgDNS only

MX Records:

10: mail.fsf.org

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:

v=spf1 redirect=gnu.org

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

See a glimpse of exposed services. Unlock to access full port inventories, CVE lookups, and mitigation priorities.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100

Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Unlock to view the complete technical breakdown, stack fingerprinting, and hardening checklist.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Unlock the full Guard report to review the complete technical breakdown and AI recommendations.

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Analyze Another Website

Is defectivebydesign.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Free Software Foundation, Inc. Reviews

Is defectivebydesign.org Safe? Security Analysis for Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Unlock the complete security report for defectivebydesign.org

How it works

Order summary

AI Summary

Detected Technologies

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Business Intelligence

Security Posture Analysis

Strategic Recommendations

✨Observations

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

🛡️Security Headers

Security Headers

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

Missing Referrer-Policy header

Sensitive data may be cached

👤GDPR Compliance

GDPR Compliance

No Cookie Policy found

No Cookie Consent Banner found

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

GDPR Compliance Analysis

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

NIS2 Compliance

No information security framework found

No vulnerability disclosure policy

No security policy documentation found

No incident response procedures found

No business continuity planning found

No security contact information

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

No NIS2 reference found

Critical sector without clear security compliance

📧Email Security

Email Security

DMARC not enforcing

No DKIM record found

No BIMI Record

No MTA-STS Policy

No TLS-RPT Record

SPF Details

DMARC Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

SSL/TLS Security

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

Mixed Content Detected

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

Certificate Details

OCSP Status

📊DNS Health

DNS Health

DNSSEC Not Enabled

CAA Records Not Configured

DMARC Policy Set to None

DNS Records

DNSSEC Status

SPF Analysis

⚡Network Security

Network Security

Service Exposed: SSH

🔧Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis

Additional Findings

Related Partner Domains

fsf.org

gnu.org

—out of 5