Is inhope.org Safe? Security Analysis for International Association of Internet Hotlines - INHOPE
https://inhope.orgCheck if inhope.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for inhope.org
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
INHOPE is a well-established international non-profit organization founded in 1999, dedicated to combating child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online through a global network of 57 member hotlines. The organization operates as a connector and supporter of these hotlines, facilitating the removal of illegal content and advocating for legislative and policy improvements. Their market position is strong, supported by partnerships with major technology companies and law enforcement agencies, and funding from the European Commission. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy presence with clear messaging and calls to action for reporting CSAM and becoming partners. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Microsoft Ads tracking, all integrated with user consent mechanisms. The site is hosted under a reputable registrar with a domain age consistent with the organization's history. Mobile optimization and SEO are well addressed, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a clear cookie consent mechanism. Security-wise, the site shows no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. Overall, the risk level is low, and the organization demonstrates a mature security and privacy culture appropriate for its non-profit mission. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, implementing a vulnerability disclosure program, and enhancing accessibility features. These improvements would strengthen the organization's security posture and stakeholder trust while maintaining its leadership role in online child protection.
Detected Technologies
12 urgent findings need attention
1 critical · 11 high
- + 4 more findings in the full report below
Keep inhope.org under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
8 findings
15/100
GDPR Compliance
3 findings
68/100
NIS2 Compliance
9 findings
2/100
Email Security
5 findings
70/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
INHOPE operates as a global non-profit network focused on fighting CSAM by connecting 57 hotlines worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive partnerships with leading technology companies and law enforcement agencies, enabling effective content removal and policy advocacy. The business model is based on collaboration, funding from the European Commission, and support from corporate partners. Target customers include internet users, hotlines, partners, and policymakers. Growth indicators include expanding hotline membership and high-profile partnerships. The partnership ecosystem is broad and includes major tech firms like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, TikTok, and Cloudflare, as well as international organizations such as Interpol and Europol. The organization's operations are transparent and professionally managed, with a clear mission and strong market presence in the child protection sector.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Company Registration
International Association of Internet Hotlines - INHOPE
RSIN: 810591777 / KVK: 34124277
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of modern tracking and analytics tools is balanced with user consent mechanisms, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC, explicit security headers, a published security policy, and incident response contact information indicates areas for improvement. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency in security management. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by addressing these gaps to reduce risk and improve stakeholder confidence.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
International Association of Internet Hotlines - INHOPE
We are the global network of member hotlines, leading the fight against child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and scripts)
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a well-established non-profit focused on combating CSAM globally.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the inhope.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete inhope.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 42 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
How does inhope.org compare?
inhope.org scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the inhope.org report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Want OffSeq to fix this?
Book a 30-minute remediation call
Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.
OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services
Scan your own website
Liked the inhope.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about inhope.org
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published