Skip to main content

Is ipy.org a Scam? Security Check Results

ipy.org Security Report Summary

ipy.org received a security score of 57 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". ipy.org operates in the Non-profit industry in N/a.

The website www.ipy.org represents the International Polar Year initiative, a collaborative international scientific effort focused on polar region research. The site provides educational resources, news, event information, and project data related to polar science. The target audience includes educators, researchers, participants, and the general public interested in polar studies. The website uses Joomla CMS with K2 components and includes legacy technologies such as Flash and older JavaScript libraries, indicating a need for modernization. Analytics tools like Google Analytics and Piwik are employed, but privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and use of deprecated technologies. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to enhance trust and compliance.

The security scan identified 31 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: JavaScript, jQuery 1.7.1, MooTools, SWFObject, Piwik Analytics.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

ipy.org favicon

Is ipy.org Safe? Security Analysis for IPY 2007-2008

https://ipy.org

Check if ipy.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/asmall
JavaScriptjQuery 1.7.1MooToolsSWFObjectPiwik Analytics
Analyzed 10/29/2025Completed 10:05:21 AM4mo ago
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for ipy.org

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainipy.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The website www.ipy.org represents the International Polar Year initiative, a collaborative international scientific effort focused on polar region research. The site provides educational resources, news, event information, and project data related to polar science. The target audience includes educators, researchers, participants, and the general public interested in polar studies. The website uses Joomla CMS with K2 components and includes legacy technologies such as Flash and older JavaScript libraries, indicating a need for modernization. Analytics tools like Google Analytics and Piwik are employed, but privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and use of deprecated technologies. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQuery 1.7.1MooToolsSWFObjectPiwik Analytics

12 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 11 high

  • + 4 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep ipy.org under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for ipy.org.

Security Headers

3 findings

70/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

35/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

5 findings

60/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The IPY initiative operates as a non-profit scientific collaboration platform, focusing on polar research and education. It serves a niche market of scientific communities, educators, and policy makers interested in Arctic and Antarctic studies. The business model appears to be informational and collaborative rather than commercial. The site links to partner domains such as arcticportal.org, indicating a partnership ecosystem. The lack of clear business contact information and privacy policies suggests limited commercial operations. Growth indicators are not evident from the site content. The partnership with Arctic Portal and use of open-source CMS reflects a cost-effective operational approach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security maturity is low. Key vulnerabilities include absence of HTTPS enforcement, outdated JavaScript libraries, and use of deprecated Flash content. No security headers are detected, and no incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is minimal with no GDPR indicators or cookie consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data transparency further reduces trust. These issues expose the site to risks such as data interception, cross-site scripting, and reputational damage. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not observable from the site.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with HSTS and ensure all site resources load securely.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The International Polar Year (or IPY) is a collaborative, international effort researching the polar regions.

Key Services:
Research collaboration on polar regionsInformation disseminationEducational resourcesEvent organization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQuery 1.7.1MooToolsSWFObjectPiwik Analytics
Frameworks:
K2 (Joomla component)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (UA-990634-23 and UA-990634-27)Piwik
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Piwik
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the ipy.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete ipy.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3239 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:144.76.12.75
Name Servers:
ns53.domaincontrol.com
ns54.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023121301, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:51ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does ipy.org compare?

See how ipy.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site is built on Joomla CMS with K2 components and uses JavaScript libraries including MooTools and jQuery 1.7.1, which are outdated. Flash content is embedded via SWFObject, which is deprecated and insecure. The site loads external scripts from Google CDN and Arctic Portal domains. Analytics are implemented using Google Analytics and Piwik. The site design is basic with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are minimal. The technical debt is significant, and modernization is recommended to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the ipy.org report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainipy.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the ipy.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about ipy.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website