Skip to main content

Is journal.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta

journal.fi Security Report Summary

journal.fi received a security score of 40 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta's website security posture. Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta operates in the Education industry in Finland.

Journal.fi is a Finnish non-profit platform operated by Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta, providing online hosting and publishing services for approximately 140 Finnish scientific journals and yearbooks. The platform targets researchers, authors, readers, publishers, and funders within the Finnish scientific community, offering multilingual support and a modern web interface based on Open Journal Systems. Technically, the site uses Apache, PHP 7.3, jQuery, and Font Awesome, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which significantly impacts its security posture. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols exposes users to potential risks, despite the presence of basic security headers like X-Frame-Options. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, but no contact information or incident response details are publicly available. Overall, the website demonstrates good content quality and usability but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

The security scan identified 31 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Apache 2.4.37, PHP 7.3.33, Open Journal Systems 3.2.1.4, jQuery 3.3.1, jQuery UI 1.12.0, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Muli), Open Journal Systems.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

T

Is journal.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta

https://journal.fi

Check if journal.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationFinlandmedium
Apache 2.4.37PHP 7.3.33Open Journal Systems 3.2.1.4jQuery 3.3.1jQuery UI 1.12.0+3 more
Analyzed 6/14/2025Completed 10:36:22 PM9mo ago
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

Below Education avg (55)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for journal.fi

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainjournal.fi
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Journal.fi is a Finnish non-profit platform operated by Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta, providing online hosting and publishing services for approximately 140 Finnish scientific journals and yearbooks. The platform targets researchers, authors, readers, publishers, and funders within the Finnish scientific community, offering multilingual support and a modern web interface based on Open Journal Systems. Technically, the site uses Apache, PHP 7.3, jQuery, and Font Awesome, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which significantly impacts its security posture. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols exposes users to potential risks, despite the presence of basic security headers like X-Frame-Options. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, but no contact information or incident response details are publicly available. Overall, the website demonstrates good content quality and usability but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Detected Technologies

Apache 2.4.37PHP 7.3.33Open Journal Systems 3.2.1.4jQuery 3.3.1jQuery UI 1.12.0Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Muli)Open Journal Systems

11 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 10 high

  • + 3 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep journal.fi under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for journal.fi.

Security Headers

7 findings

30/100

GDPR Compliance

6 findings

0/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

5 findings

60/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Journal.fi holds a leading position in the Finnish scientific publishing sector as a dedicated platform for open access journals. Its non-profit business model focuses on serving the academic community by providing a centralized, accessible repository for scientific literature. The platform's use of Open Journal Systems aligns with industry standards for academic publishing. The lack of visible contact details and incident response mechanisms may limit direct engagement with users but reflects a focus on content delivery rather than commercial operations. The partnership with Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta strengthens its credibility and institutional backing. Growth opportunities include improving security, expanding multilingual capabilities, and enhancing user engagement through additional services.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability for any modern web service. The server uses outdated PHP 7.3 and Apache 2.4.37, which may have unpatched vulnerabilities. Security headers are minimal, with only X-Frame-Options set to SAMEORIGIN. There is no evidence of advanced protections such as HSTS, Content Security Policy, or OCSP stapling. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. While no active vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the lack of encryption and modern protocols poses significant risks to data confidentiality and integrity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the journal.fi security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

0/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

Software version information exposed

MEDIUM

Server headers reveal software versions which could aid attackers

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete journal.fi security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.148.72.0/26 ip6:2001:708:1f0::/48 mx -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:reports@tsv.fi
Forensic Reports:reports@tsv.fi

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:195.148.72.39
Name Servers:
ns.tsv.fiDNS only
ns2.tsv.fiDNS only
MX Records:
10: promail.tsv.fi

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does journal.fi compare?

journal.fi scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Open Journal Systems 3.2.1.4, running on Apache 2.4.37 with PHP 7.3.33. It uses common web libraries such as jQuery 3.3.1 and Font Awesome 4.7.0, with Google Fonts for typography. The DNS setup includes SPF records but lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could improve domain security. The site lacks HTTPS support due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate, and no modern TLS protocols are enabled. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the site appears to have a moderate design quality with basic accessibility features. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but uses ns.tsv.fi nameservers. There is no evidence of analytics or advertising scripts, indicating a focus on content delivery without tracking or monetization.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the journal.fi report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainjournal.fi
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Want OffSeq to fix this?

Book a 30-minute remediation call

Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.

OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services

Scan your own website

Liked the journal.fi report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about journal.fi

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website