Skip to main content

Is last.fm a Scam? Security Check Results - Last.fm

last.fm Security Report Summary

last.fm received a security score of 72 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Last.fm's website security posture. Last.fm operates in the Media industry in United Kingdom.

Last.fm is a well-established online music service founded in 2002, offering music streaming, artist discovery, and personalized recommendations to a global audience. The platform holds a strong market position as one of the largest music services worldwide, supported by a large user base and extensive music metadata. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including RequireJS, New Relic monitoring, and integrates with Apple Music, ensuring a fast and responsive user experience optimized for mobile and desktop platforms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although a dedicated security policy page and incident response contacts are not publicly found. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with active consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity.

The security scan identified 27 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: JavaScript, RequireJS, New Relic Browser monitoring, HTML5, CSS3, Apple Music integration.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

last.fm favicon

Is last.fm Safe? Security Analysis for Last.fm

https://last.fm

Check if last.fm is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Kingdomlarge
JavaScriptRequireJSNew Relic Browser monitoringHTML5CSS3+1 more
Analyzed 10/11/2025Completed 5:42:48 AM5mo ago
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Media avg (58)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for last.fm

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainlast.fm
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Last.fm is a well-established online music service founded in 2002, offering music streaming, artist discovery, and personalized recommendations to a global audience. The platform holds a strong market position as one of the largest music services worldwide, supported by a large user base and extensive music metadata. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including RequireJS, New Relic monitoring, and integrates with Apple Music, ensuring a fast and responsive user experience optimized for mobile and desktop platforms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although a dedicated security policy page and incident response contacts are not publicly found. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with active consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptRequireJSNew Relic Browser monitoringHTML5CSS3Apple Music integration

5 urgent findings need attention

5 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep last.fm under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for last.fm.

Security Headers

6 findings

55/100

GDPR Compliance

2 findings

83/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

4 findings

75/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Last.fm operates in the media sector, focusing on music streaming and discovery. Its business model revolves around user engagement through personalized music recommendations and scrobbling technology. The company targets music enthusiasts globally, leveraging partnerships and integrations with platforms like Apple Music. The website's consistent branding and comprehensive content support its large-scale operations. While direct contact details are limited to a contact form, the presence of privacy and cookie policies, along with social media engagement, reinforces its credibility. The domain's long registration history and alignment with the registrant organization further validate its legitimacy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Content Security Policy, and other security headers that mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Monitoring tools like New Relic are integrated for performance and error tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program and lack of explicit incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene suitable for its business scale.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Last.fm

Description:

The world's largest online music service. Listen online, find out more about your favourite artists, and get music recommendations, only at Last.fm

Key Services:
Music streamingMusic recommendationsArtist and song discoveryUser scrobbling and tracking
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptRequireJSNew Relic Browser monitoringHTML5CSS3Apple Music integration
Frameworks:
RequireJS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security event monitoring (New Relic)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsNew Relic Browser
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ad ManagerAdsafe Protected
Tracking Pixels:
New Relic Browser
Marketing Tools:
TealiumOneTrust Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the last.fm security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete last.fm security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:64.30.226.54/31 ip4:74.125.148.0/22 ip4:216.239.125.28/28 ip4:202.73.54.176/28 ip4:58.65.7.128/28 ip4:62.108.138.0/28 ip4:216.239.114.214/31 ip4:216.239.114.222/31 ip4:216.239.122.115 ip4:216.239.122.135 include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:lastfm-dmarc-reports-GRP@paramount.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.last.fm
Issuer:Sectigo RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA
Valid Until:3/25/2026 (165 days)
SANs:*.last.fm, last.fm

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(expired)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.96.123.111
Name Servers:
dns1.p09.nsone.net
dns2.p09.nsone.net
dns3.p09.nsone.net
dns4.p09.nsone.net
ns0004.secondary.cloudflare.com
ns0243.secondary.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: mxa-00262c01.gslb.pphosted.com
0: mxb-00262c01.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 1654459712, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:64.30.226.54/31 ip4:74.125.148.0/22 ip4:216.239.125.28/28 ip4:202.73.54.176/28 ip4:58.65.7.128/28 ip4:62.108.138.0/28 ip4:216.239.114.214/31 ip4:216.239.114.222/31 ip4:216.239.122.115 ip4:216.239.122.135 include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does last.fm compare?

See how last.fm stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with RequireJS for module loading and New Relic for monitoring. It leverages CDNs for static assets and third-party services for consent management and analytics. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing. Hosting appears to be via reputable CDN providers ensuring fast global delivery. There is no indication of legacy or deprecated technologies, suggesting good technical maintenance and modernization.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the last.fm report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainlast.fm
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the last.fm report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about last.fm

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website