Skip to main content

Is minecraft.wiki a Scam? Security Check Results - Weird Gloop Ltd

minecraft.wiki Security Report Summary

minecraft.wiki received a security score of 66 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Weird Gloop Ltd's website security posture. Weird Gloop Ltd operates in the Technology industry in United Kingdom.

Minecraft Wiki is a community-driven online encyclopedia dedicated to providing comprehensive information about the Minecraft game. Operated by Weird Gloop Ltd, a UK-based entity, the site serves Minecraft players and enthusiasts by offering detailed game mechanics, item descriptions, and update notes. The website is built on the MediaWiki platform, leveraging a well-known content management system for collaborative knowledge sharing. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers, indicating room for security enhancements. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, ensuring user accessibility. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, suggests limited compliance with privacy regulations and reduced transparency. Overall, the website presents good content quality and user experience but requires improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

The security scan identified 26 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: MediaWiki, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

W

Is minecraft.wiki Safe? Security Analysis for Weird Gloop Ltd

https://minecraft.wiki

Check if minecraft.wiki is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdomsmall
MediaWikiJavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 7/27/2025Completed 3:22:25 AM8mo ago
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Technology avg (72)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for minecraft.wiki

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainminecraft.wiki
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Minecraft Wiki is a community-driven online encyclopedia dedicated to providing comprehensive information about the Minecraft game. Operated by Weird Gloop Ltd, a UK-based entity, the site serves Minecraft players and enthusiasts by offering detailed game mechanics, item descriptions, and update notes. The website is built on the MediaWiki platform, leveraging a well-known content management system for collaborative knowledge sharing. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers, indicating room for security enhancements. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, ensuring user accessibility. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, suggests limited compliance with privacy regulations and reduced transparency. Overall, the website presents good content quality and user experience but requires improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

MediaWikiJavaScriptCloudflare DNS

8 urgent findings need attention

8 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep minecraft.wiki under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for minecraft.wiki.

Security Headers

3 findings

70/100

GDPR Compliance

3 findings

68/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

4 findings

70/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Minecraft Wiki operates as a niche informational resource targeting the gaming community interested in Minecraft. Its business model is primarily community-driven, relying on user contributions and engagement rather than direct monetization. The domain registration is recent, consistent with the site's launch timeline, and the registrant information is transparent and matches the website's language and regional focus. The site does not display advertising or tracking technologies, indicating a focus on content over commercial activities. The lack of explicit business contact details and policies may limit its appeal to commercial partners or advertisers. The site holds a strong position as a specialized knowledge base within the Minecraft ecosystem, with potential for growth through enhanced compliance and security measures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. It uses HTTPS (implied by Cloudflare DNS and typical MediaWiki deployment), but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose it to DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected in the provided HTML content, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, nor any dedicated security contact channels. The absence of these elements suggests limited formal security governance and incident readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. To improve security maturity, the site should implement DNSSEC, add security headers, publish security policies, and provide incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Weird Gloop Ltd

Description:

Minecraft Wiki is an online encyclopedia dedicated to the Minecraft game, providing detailed information about game mechanics, items, mobs, and updates.

Key Services:
Minecraft game informationGame updates documentationCommunity content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
MediaWikiJavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
MediaWiki
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a MediaWiki-based Minecraft encyclopedia.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the minecraft.wiki security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete minecraft.wiki security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:minecraft.wiki
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/4/2025 (69 days)
SANs:minecraft.wiki, *.minecraft.wiki

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(123 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.6.107, 104.26.7.107, 172.67.72.106
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::ac43:486a, 2606:4700:20::681a:66b, 2606:4700:20::681a:76b
Name Servers:
naomi.ns.cloudflare.com
tom.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
50: route3.mx.cloudflare.net
26: route2.mx.cloudflare.net
86: route1.mx.cloudflare.net
SOA:Serial: 2378314116, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does minecraft.wiki compare?

See how minecraft.wiki stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by MediaWiki, a mature and widely used wiki platform, indicating a solid foundation for content management. The use of Cloudflare DNS suggests some level of performance and security optimization, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The HTML content is well-structured with modern JavaScript modules and CSS stylesheets, supporting good user experience and mobile optimization. However, no advanced analytics or marketing tools were detected, which may limit insights into user behavior and marketing effectiveness. The site performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through caching and optimization. Accessibility features appear basic but functional. SEO optimization is present but could be enhanced with richer metadata and structured data.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the minecraft.wiki report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainminecraft.wiki
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the minecraft.wiki report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about minecraft.wiki

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website