Skip to main content

Is ofk.no a Scam? Security Check Results - Østfold fylkeskommune

ofk.no Security Report Summary

ofk.no received a security score of 66 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Østfold fylkeskommune's website security posture. Østfold fylkeskommune operates in the Government industry in Norway.

Østfold fylkeskommune is the official regional government authority for Østfold county in Norway, providing a range of public services including education, health, infrastructure, and political information. The website serves as an information portal for residents and stakeholders, reflecting a medium-sized public sector entity established in 2024. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content relevance, targeting a Norwegian-speaking audience. Technically, the website employs a mix of modern JavaScript modules and legacy jQuery libraries, hosted on a CMS platform likely tailored for government use. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, with accessibility and SEO features implemented to a good standard. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enforced but lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and consistency of the entity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

The security scan identified 29 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: JavaScript, jQuery 1.12.4, Remixicon fonts, Google Fonts (Inter), Siteimprove Analytics.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

ofk.no favicon

Is ofk.no Safe? Security Analysis for Østfold fylkeskommune

https://ofk.no

Check if ofk.no is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentNorwaymedium
JavaScriptjQuery 1.12.4Remixicon fontsGoogle Fonts (Inter)Siteimprove Analytics
Analyzed 10/30/2025Completed 8:08:10 PM4mo ago
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Government avg (70)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for ofk.no

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainofk.no
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Østfold fylkeskommune is the official regional government authority for Østfold county in Norway, providing a range of public services including education, health, infrastructure, and political information. The website serves as an information portal for residents and stakeholders, reflecting a medium-sized public sector entity established in 2024. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content relevance, targeting a Norwegian-speaking audience. Technically, the website employs a mix of modern JavaScript modules and legacy jQuery libraries, hosted on a CMS platform likely tailored for government use. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, with accessibility and SEO features implemented to a good standard. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enforced but lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and consistency of the entity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQuery 1.12.4Remixicon fontsGoogle Fonts (Inter)Siteimprove Analytics

9 urgent findings need attention

9 high

  • + 1 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep ofk.no under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for ofk.no.

Security Headers

6 findings

55/100

GDPR Compliance

3 findings

50/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

3 findings

83/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website represents a government entity focused on regional administration and public service delivery. Its market position is that of an essential public sector organization serving the Østfold region. The business model is non-commercial, funded by public resources, and aimed at providing transparent access to services and information. Key services include education management, health services, infrastructure oversight, and political governance. The target audience comprises local residents, students, public employees, and political stakeholders. The website does not engage in commercial activities or advertising, maintaining a focus on service provision. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains suggests a standalone government operation. Growth indicators are not applicable, but the recent domain creation aligns with organizational restructuring or establishment. The partnership ecosystem is limited to public sector collaborations, not evident in the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content, but the use of an older jQuery version (1.12.4) may pose potential risks if not properly patched. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no GDPR-related policies or cookie consent mechanisms found. Overall, the security score is moderate, reflecting good foundational practices but room for significant improvement in policy publication and technical hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Østfold fylkeskommune

Description:

Velkommen til Østfold fylkeskommune. Her finner du informasjon om våre tjenester, politikk og fagområder

Key Services:
Public servicesPolitical informationEducation and trainingHealth servicesInfrastructure management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQuery 1.12.4Remixicon fontsGoogle Fonts (Inter)Siteimprove Analytics
Frameworks:
Vanilla JS modulesReactJS (cookie notice component)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Siteimprove Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Siteimprove Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official regional government website for Østfold county, Norway.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the ofk.no security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete ofk.no security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

83/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_se_net.axiell.com include:_spf.sndr.no include:spf.topdesk.net include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.isp.as2116.net include:spf.mailjet.com ip4:51.13.86.102 ip4:149.72.200.207 ip4:82.134.18.219 ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:bt9ndkwa@ag.eu.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:bt9ndkwa@fr.eu.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)

DNS Records

A Records:176.221.90.97
AAAA Records:2a02:2838:1::2
Name Servers:
ns01.no.brand.one.comDNS only
ns02.no.brand.one.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: ofk-no.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025103001, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled(Algorithm: 7)

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:35ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_se_net.axiell.com include:_spf.sndr.no include:spf.topdesk.net include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.isp.as2116.net include:spf.mailjet.com ip4:51.13.86.102 ip4:149.72.200.207 ip4:82.134.18.219 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does ofk.no compare?

See how ofk.no stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a CMS platform (likely ACO CMS) with a combination of vanilla JavaScript modules and legacy jQuery 1.12.4 scripts. Styling uses CSS with responsive design principles and Google Fonts (Inter). The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as jsdelivr.net and fonts.googleapis.com. Siteimprove Analytics is integrated for quality and accessibility monitoring. The site uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts identified. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by semantic HTML and ARIA roles. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph images. Technical risks include the use of outdated jQuery and lack of security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the ofk.no report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainofk.no
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the ofk.no report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about ofk.no

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website