Skip to main content

Is onlio.com a Scam? Security Check Results

onlio.com Security Report Summary

onlio.com received a security score of 52 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". onlio.com operates in the Other industry in N/a.

The website onlio.com currently presents a security verification page that uses Google reCAPTCHA invisible challenge to verify visitors are not bots. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism, limiting direct access to content. Due to this, no business description, contact information, or policies are visible, restricting a full analysis of the company's operations or services. The domain is well-established, registered since 2008, which suggests a mature presence, but the lack of visible content and policies reduces trust and transparency. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The page is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers are not enabled or visible, representing areas for improvement. From a security posture perspective, the use of reCAPTCHA is a positive control against automated abuse. However, the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, and contact information reduces the overall security maturity and compliance posture. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, with no privacy protection, which supports legitimacy but also highlights the need for better public-facing trust signals. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible beyond the security challenge, limiting content and business insights. The risk assessment is moderate due to the lack of visible information and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

The security scan identified 32 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google reCAPTCHA v3.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

O

Is onlio.com Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

https://onlio.com

Check if onlio.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 10/27/2025Completed 11:28:47 PM6mo ago
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for onlio.com

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainonlio.com
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The website onlio.com currently presents a security verification page that uses Google reCAPTCHA invisible challenge to verify visitors are not bots. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism, limiting direct access to content. Due to this, no business description, contact information, or policies are visible, restricting a full analysis of the company's operations or services. The domain is well-established, registered since 2008, which suggests a mature presence, but the lack of visible content and policies reduces trust and transparency. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The page is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers are not enabled or visible, representing areas for improvement. From a security posture perspective, the use of reCAPTCHA is a positive control against automated abuse. However, the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, and contact information reduces the overall security maturity and compliance posture. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, with no privacy protection, which supports legitimacy but also highlights the need for better public-facing trust signals. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible beyond the security challenge, limiting content and business insights. The risk assessment is moderate due to the lack of visible information and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

13 urgent findings need attention

13 high

  • + 5 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep onlio.com under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for onlio.com.

Security Headers

8 findings

15/100

GDPR Compliance

3 findings

50/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

3 findings

77/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security verification page blocking access, no direct business intelligence such as market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments can be determined. The domain age suggests a long-standing entity, but no company name or description is provided. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of visible content and policies limits competitive analysis and growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 as a bot mitigation control, indicating some level of security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and visible privacy or security policies points to gaps in security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, which supports trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge with Google reCAPTCHA invisible token and spinner, indicating bot protection or WAF challenge.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Form submission protected by invisible reCAPTCHA

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA invisible challenge.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the onlio.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete onlio.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

77/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 336-bit key

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:188.245.91.88 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.atlassian.net include:_spf.vyfakturuj.cz -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(336-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:admins@onlio.com
Forensic Reports:admins@onlio.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(30 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.191
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::191
Name Servers:
ns1.ignum.com
ns2.ignum.cz
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090502, TTL: 360s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:29ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:188.245.91.88 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.atlassian.net include:_spf.vyfakturuj.cz -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does onlio.com compare?

See how onlio.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for invisible bot protection. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The page is minimalistic, serving only as a security verification challenge with a spinner and invisible form submission. External resources are loaded from jsdelivr.net and google.com domains. DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain. No security headers are visible in the HTML content. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but user experience is poor due to the blocking challenge. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO metadata is minimal with no Open Graph or structured data present.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the onlio.com report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainonlio.com
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the onlio.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about onlio.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website