Skip to main content

Is publicdomainreview.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Adam Green

publicdomainreview.org Security Report Summary

publicdomainreview.org received a security score of 66 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Adam Green's website security posture. Adam Green operates in the Non-profit industry in United Kingdom.

The Public Domain Review is a well-established non-profit online journal dedicated to showcasing and exploring curious and compelling works from the history of art, literature, and ideas that are in the public domain. Founded in 2011 and registered in the UK under Adam Green, it serves a broad audience including researchers, educators, and enthusiasts interested in public domain content. The website offers curated collections, essays, and sells prints and books to support its mission. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and content quality, making it a reliable resource in its niche.

The security scan identified 29 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: React, Gatsby, Snipcart.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

publicdomainreview.org favicon

Is publicdomainreview.org Safe? Security Analysis for Adam Green

https://publicdomainreview.org

Check if publicdomainreview.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Kingdomsmall
ReactGatsbySnipcart
Analyzed 7/26/2025Completed 3:46:27 PM8mo ago
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for publicdomainreview.org

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainpublicdomainreview.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The Public Domain Review is a well-established non-profit online journal dedicated to showcasing and exploring curious and compelling works from the history of art, literature, and ideas that are in the public domain. Founded in 2011 and registered in the UK under Adam Green, it serves a broad audience including researchers, educators, and enthusiasts interested in public domain content. The website offers curated collections, essays, and sells prints and books to support its mission. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and content quality, making it a reliable resource in its niche.

Detected Technologies

ReactGatsbySnipcart

8 urgent findings need attention

8 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep publicdomainreview.org under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for publicdomainreview.org.

Security Headers

4 findings

65/100

GDPR Compliance

3 findings

68/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

6 findings

55/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Public Domain Review occupies a niche market as a digital humanities and public domain content curator. Its non-profit business model relies on donations and sales of prints and books, targeting a specialized audience interested in historical and artistic works. The organization maintains consistent branding and a professional online presence, leveraging social media platforms for outreach. The domain age and registrant information align well with the business history, indicating legitimacy. The site’s technical infrastructure supports scalability and user engagement, though it lacks some advanced security disclosures. The absence of commercial advertising and minimal tracking reflects its non-profit ethos and respect for user privacy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited are in place, enhancing domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved to prevent DNS spoofing. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, and no dedicated incident response contact is published, which are areas for enhancement. Forms appear to be standard with no exposed sensitive data detected. Overall, the security risk is low but could benefit from formalized security policies and DNS security improvements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Adam Green

Description:

Online journal and not-for-profit project dedicated to the exploration of curious and compelling works from the history of art, literature, and ideas.

Key Services:
Online journal articlesCurated collections of public domain worksPrints and book sales
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactGatsbySnipcart
Frameworks:
Gatsby
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use standard input validation

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Snipcart (e-commerce)Social media platforms
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-established non-profit digital journal

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the publicdomainreview.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete publicdomainreview.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zapier.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:publicdomainreview.org
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:9/3/2025 (38 days)
SANs:publicdomainreview.org, www.publicdomainreview.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:98.84.224.111, 18.208.88.157
AAAA Records:2600:1f18:16e:df01::258, 2600:1f18:16e:df01::259
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.comDNS only
ns2.dnsimple.comDNS only
ns3.dnsimple.comDNS only
ns4.dnsimple.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1574336943, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:89ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zapier.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does publicdomainreview.org compare?

See how publicdomainreview.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The Public Domain Review uses a modern static site generation approach with Gatsby and React, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The site uses Snipcart for e-commerce functionality, integrating print and book sales seamlessly. DNS is managed via DNSimple, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site’s HTML and CSS are valid and optimized for SEO with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility considerations are evident in the design and markup. Hosting details are not explicit but performance indicators suggest a reliable hosting environment. The technical stack is well-suited for the site's content-driven, non-profit mission with minimal technical debt and good scalability potential.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the publicdomainreview.org report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainpublicdomainreview.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the publicdomainreview.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about publicdomainreview.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website