Skip to main content

Is rbf.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Rockefeller Brothers Fund

rbf.org Security Report Summary

rbf.org received a security score of 69 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Rockefeller Brothers Fund's website security posture. Rockefeller Brothers Fund operates in the Non-profit industry in United States.

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is a well-established philanthropic foundation focused on advancing social change for a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world. Their website clearly communicates their mission, thematic programs, grantmaking activities, and mission-aligned investing initiatives. The organization targets philanthropic partners, grantees, and social change advocates, positioning itself as a key player in the non-profit sector with a global reach. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Plausible Analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, providing a professional and user-friendly experience. However, some security best practices like security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not significantly impact the trustworthiness given the strong branding and external social media presence. Overall, the site maintains a solid security posture but could enhance compliance and transparency. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on improving security headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

The security scan identified 26 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Drupal 10, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Plausible Analytics.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

R

Is rbf.org Safe? Security Analysis for Rockefeller Brothers Fund

https://rbf.org

Check if rbf.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Stateslarge
Drupal 10Google AnalyticsHotjarPlausible Analytics
Analyzed 7/13/2025Completed 6:07:31 AM8mo ago
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for rbf.org

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainrbf.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is a well-established philanthropic foundation focused on advancing social change for a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world. Their website clearly communicates their mission, thematic programs, grantmaking activities, and mission-aligned investing initiatives. The organization targets philanthropic partners, grantees, and social change advocates, positioning itself as a key player in the non-profit sector with a global reach. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Plausible Analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, providing a professional and user-friendly experience. However, some security best practices like security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not significantly impact the trustworthiness given the strong branding and external social media presence. Overall, the site maintains a solid security posture but could enhance compliance and transparency. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on improving security headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 10Google AnalyticsHotjarPlausible Analytics

9 urgent findings need attention

9 high

  • + 1 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep rbf.org under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for rbf.org.

Security Headers

4 findings

55/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

53/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

3 findings

85/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund operates as a large non-profit philanthropic entity with a focus on social change, sustainability, peacebuilding, and arts & culture. Their business model centers on grantmaking and mission-aligned investing, serving a global audience of grantees and partners. The organization benefits from a strong brand legacy and a comprehensive program portfolio. Their digital presence is mature, with multilingual support and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include program expansion and public events at the Pocantico Center. The partnership ecosystem includes a Chinese language site, indicating international outreach. Strategic observations suggest continued emphasis on transparency, impact measurement, and mission-driven investing.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure form handling, and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency for security researchers and users. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rockefeller Brothers Fund

Description:

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund advances social change that contributes to a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world.

Key Services:
GrantmakingMission-aligned investing
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 10Google AnalyticsHotjarPlausible Analytics
Frameworks:
Drupal CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms (MailChimp subscription form with anti-bot hidden field)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjarPlausible Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HotjarPlausible Analytics
Marketing Tools:
MailChimp
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear navigation

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the rbf.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete rbf.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email
Forensic Reports:postmaster@rbf.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:rbf.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/18/2025 (67 days)
SANs:rbf.org, *.rbf.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(63 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.43.69, 172.66.40.187
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3108::ac42:28bb, 2606:4700:3108::ac42:2b45
Name Servers:
chin.ns.cloudflare.com
pablo.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: rbf-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2375933339, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does rbf.org compare?

See how rbf.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It integrates multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Hotjar, Plausible) for comprehensive user behavior insights. The site uses responsive design and accessibility features, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and structured navigation. However, the absence of detected security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the rbf.org report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainrbf.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the rbf.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about rbf.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website