Is scholarsatrisk.org Safe? Security Analysis for Scholars at Risk
https://scholarsatrisk.orgCheck if scholarsatrisk.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for scholarsatrisk.org
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
Scholars at Risk is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to protecting threatened scholars and promoting academic freedom globally. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and a consistent brand identity. It serves academic institutions, scholars, students, and advocacy groups by providing protection services, advocacy initiatives, and educational resources. The organization is positioned as a trusted leader in its niche with a medium-sized network and a founding date of 2009. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Mapbox, and social media platforms. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though some security headers are missing and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding explicit security headers, a cookie consent banner, and publishing a security policy and incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of non-profit. Contact information is clear and includes a physical address and phone number, enhancing trustworthiness. The website is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected. It effectively balances advocacy, education, and protection services with a professional and trustworthy online presence.
Detected Technologies
13 urgent findings need attention
2 critical · 11 high
- + 5 more findings in the full report below
Keep scholarsatrisk.org under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
8 findings
15/100
GDPR Compliance
3 findings
58/100
NIS2 Compliance
8 findings
17/100
Email Security
5 findings
60/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Scholars at Risk operates in the non-profit sector focused on academic freedom and scholar protection. Its business model revolves around a global network of institutions and individuals providing sanctuary, advocacy, and educational programs. The organization leverages partnerships with academic institutions and advocacy groups to extend its reach. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and membership contributions. The website's integration with platforms like EveryAction suggests active fundraising and supporter engagement. The organization maintains a strong social media presence and regularly publishes reports and newsletters, indicating active community engagement and thought leadership. The lack of visible commercial activity aligns with its non-profit mission. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining digital security and privacy to protect vulnerable scholars and the organization's reputation.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. The presence of Wordfence scripts suggests active security monitoring. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could be exploited by attackers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by the privacy policy, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and incident response disclosures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Scholars at Risk
Scholars at Risk is an international network dedicated to protecting scholars and promoting academic freedom worldwide. It provides sanctuary and assistance to threatened scholars, advocates against attacks on higher education communities, and empowers scholars and students to promote free inquiry and expression.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Security plugin Wordfence indicated by script
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the scholarsatrisk.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete scholarsatrisk.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 76 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL
CRITICALPort 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server
How does scholarsatrisk.org compare?
scholarsatrisk.org scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the scholarsatrisk.org report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Want OffSeq to fix this?
Book a 30-minute remediation call
Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.
OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services
Scan your own website
Liked the scholarsatrisk.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about scholarsatrisk.org
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published