Skip to main content

Is science.org a Scam? Security Check Results - American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

science.org Security Report Summary

science.org received a security score of 71 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)'s website security posture. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) operates in the Education industry in United States.

The website www.science.org is the official online presence of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a leading global scientific publisher and association. It offers peer-reviewed journals, scientific news, expert commentary, and career resources targeted at researchers, academics, and science professionals. The site supports a subscription and membership business model, providing exclusive content and community access to members. The brand is well-established with consistent and professional presentation, reflecting its enterprise-level stature in the education and media sectors. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Adobe DTM, and Cloudflare Insights for performance and analytics. It is hosted likely behind Cloudflare, ensuring fast loading and robust security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine understanding. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly detailed, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture, excellent content quality, and good privacy compliance. The lack of WHOIS data is attributed to privacy protection and does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its well-known institutional backing. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and enhancing security contact information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

The security scan identified 26 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: JavaScript, React (likely), Google Tag Manager, Adobe DTM, OneSignal, Cloudflare Insights, Moment.js, Swiper.js.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

A

Is science.org Safe? Security Analysis for American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

https://science.org

Check if science.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Statesenterprise
JavaScriptReact (likely)Google Tag ManagerAdobe DTMOneSignal+3 more
Analyzed 11/1/2025Completed 3:30:56 PM4mo ago
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Education avg (55)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for science.org

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainscience.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The website www.science.org is the official online presence of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a leading global scientific publisher and association. It offers peer-reviewed journals, scientific news, expert commentary, and career resources targeted at researchers, academics, and science professionals. The site supports a subscription and membership business model, providing exclusive content and community access to members. The brand is well-established with consistent and professional presentation, reflecting its enterprise-level stature in the education and media sectors. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Adobe DTM, and Cloudflare Insights for performance and analytics. It is hosted likely behind Cloudflare, ensuring fast loading and robust security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine understanding. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly detailed, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture, excellent content quality, and good privacy compliance. The lack of WHOIS data is attributed to privacy protection and does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its well-known institutional backing. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and enhancing security contact information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReact (likely)Google Tag ManagerAdobe DTMOneSignalCloudflare InsightsMoment.jsSwiper.js

7 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 6 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep science.org under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for science.org.

Security Headers

4 findings

65/100

GDPR Compliance

No critical findings yet

100/100

NIS2 Compliance

6 findings

47/100

Email Security

6 findings

40/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AAAS holds a dominant position in the academic publishing market, leveraging its flagship journal Science and several partner journals. Its business model revolves around memberships, subscriptions, and providing authoritative scientific content. The target audience includes scientists, educators, policymakers, and students globally. The organization benefits from a strong brand, extensive partnerships, and a comprehensive digital ecosystem. Growth indicators include active promotion of membership benefits and integration of career resources. The site’s partnership domains and advertising practices reflect a mature marketing and outreach strategy supporting revenue diversification.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. The use of Cloudflare and Adobe DTM indicates professional security and tag management practices. No direct vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were found. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified for this type of organization. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced public documentation and dedicated security contact channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or legal section.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Description:

Science/AAAS peer-reviewed journals deliver impactful research, daily news, expert commentary, and career resources.

Key Services:
Scientific journals publicationNews and commentary on scienceCareer resources for scientistsMembership benefits
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReact (likely)Google Tag ManagerAdobe DTMOneSignalCloudflare InsightsMoment.jsSwiper.js
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (navbar classes)Adobe Dynamic Tag Management
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook AnalyticsTwitter AnalyticsCloudflare Insights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClickSemetric Media
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelTwitter Universal Website TagGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
Adobe DTMOneSignal Web Push
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the science.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete science.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1066 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.8.62.150, 54.151.119.244
Name Servers:
ns01.aaas.org
ns02.aaas.org
ns03.aaas.org
SOA:Serial: 2025032500, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does science.org compare?

See how science.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern, performant technology stack with extensive use of JavaScript, asynchronous loading, and third-party integrations for analytics and marketing. It uses responsive design frameworks and accessibility best practices. Hosting behind Cloudflare provides performance and security benefits. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to avoid security risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and robust operational stability.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the science.org report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainscience.org
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the science.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about science.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website