Skip to main content

Is sf.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - City and County of San Francisco

sf.gov Security Report Summary

sf.gov received a security score of 57 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers City and County of San Francisco's website security posture. City and County of San Francisco operates in the Government industry in United States.

The City and County of San Francisco operates SF.gov as its official government portal, providing residents, businesses, and visitors with access to a wide range of public services and information. The website features comprehensive content including services like job search, marriage licensing, birth certificate requests, and contact information for city staff. It also prominently displays profiles of elected officials, reinforcing its authoritative position as a government resource. The site targets a broad audience including local citizens, government employees, and businesses operating within San Francisco. Technically, SF.gov is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with a CMS likely based on Wagtail. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking and performance monitoring. The website is served over HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a robust security posture. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and explicit security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices such as enforcing HTTPS, implementing security headers, and avoiding exposure of sensitive data. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. The WHOIS data is limited, showing no registrar or creation date, but this is typical for government domains using privacy protection. The domain's legitimacy is supported by consistent branding and official content. Overall, SF.gov presents a secure, professional, and trustworthy online presence for the San Francisco government. Strategically, the site should enhance privacy compliance by implementing a cookie consent banner and publishing clear security policies and incident response contacts. Adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file would further improve transparency and trust. Regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools are recommended to maintain security and privacy standards. These steps will strengthen the site's compliance posture and user trust while maintaining its role as a critical public service platform.

The security scan identified 30 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

C

Is sf.gov Safe? Security Analysis for City and County of San Francisco

https://sf.gov

Check if sf.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/5/2025Completed 7:06:39 PM10mo ago
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Government avg (70)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for sf.gov

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainsf.gov
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The City and County of San Francisco operates SF.gov as its official government portal, providing residents, businesses, and visitors with access to a wide range of public services and information. The website features comprehensive content including services like job search, marriage licensing, birth certificate requests, and contact information for city staff. It also prominently displays profiles of elected officials, reinforcing its authoritative position as a government resource. The site targets a broad audience including local citizens, government employees, and businesses operating within San Francisco. Technically, SF.gov is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with a CMS likely based on Wagtail. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking and performance monitoring. The website is served over HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a robust security posture. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and explicit security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices such as enforcing HTTPS, implementing security headers, and avoiding exposure of sensitive data. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. The WHOIS data is limited, showing no registrar or creation date, but this is typical for government domains using privacy protection. The domain's legitimacy is supported by consistent branding and official content. Overall, SF.gov presents a secure, professional, and trustworthy online presence for the San Francisco government. Strategically, the site should enhance privacy compliance by implementing a cookie consent banner and publishing clear security policies and incident response contacts. Adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file would further improve transparency and trust. Regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools are recommended to maintain security and privacy standards. These steps will strengthen the site's compliance posture and user trust while maintaining its role as a critical public service platform.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics

11 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 10 high

  • + 3 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep sf.gov under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for sf.gov.

Security Headers

7 findings

20/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

53/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

3 findings

85/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SF.gov serves as the digital gateway for the City and County of San Francisco, positioning itself as the authoritative source for municipal services and information. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status, comprehensive service offerings, and integration with related government domains such as careers.sf.gov and sfbos.org. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service delivery and civic engagement. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government entity. The target customer segments include residents, city employees, businesses, and visitors. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and multi-language support, reflecting inclusivity and responsiveness. The partnership ecosystem includes various city departments and agencies, enhancing service integration. Operationally, the site demonstrates maturity with modern technology adoption and strong content governance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of SF.gov is high, evidenced by HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and absence of exposed sensitive data. The site uses modern frameworks and avoids vulnerable libraries, reducing attack surface. However, gaps exist in privacy compliance, notably the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit security policies. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contacts or procedures. Data protection practices appear sound, but transparency could be improved with a vulnerability disclosure program. The security culture is implied to be strong given the official nature and professional presentation, but explicit indicators are limited. Overall, the site balances strong technical security with opportunities to enhance compliance and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

City and County of San Francisco

Description:

Services and information from the City and County of San Francisco.

Key Services:
Job searchMarriage licensingBirth certificate requestsCity staff informationContact the City
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Forms use proper input types and labels

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the sf.gov security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete sf.gov security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 exists:%{i}._i.%{d}._d.espf.agari.com include:%{d}.0c.spf-protect.agari.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:city-and-county-of-san-francisco@rua.agari.com
Forensic Reports:city-and-county-of-san-francisco@ruf.agari.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

30/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expired

CRITICAL

Domain expired 61 days ago

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
expired(expired)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Domain expired 61 days ago
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.129.68, 75.2.65.169
Name Servers:
dns101.netops.sspdata.net
dns101.tripwire.netDNS only
dns111.netops.sspdata.net
dns121.netops.sspdata.net
ns1.sfgov.org
ns2.sfgov.org
SOA:Serial: 2025061102, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 exists:%{i}._i.%{d}._d.espf.agari.com include:%{d}.0c.spf-protect.agari.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does sf.gov compare?

See how sf.gov stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

SF.gov is built on a modern, scalable infrastructure leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, supported by a Wagtail CMS backend. The site demonstrates excellent performance and mobile responsiveness, with optimized images and preloaded fonts. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are implemented, enhancing usability for all users. SEO is supported through proper meta tags and structured data. The integration of Google Tag Manager and Analytics enables effective monitoring of user behavior and site performance. Technical risks are minimal, with no detected outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting enhanced privacy tools and expanding security transparency measures.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the sf.gov report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainsf.gov
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the sf.gov report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about sf.gov

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website