Is sf.gov Safe? Security Analysis for City and County of San Francisco
https://sf.govCheck if sf.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
Below Government avg (70)
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for sf.gov
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
The City and County of San Francisco operates SF.gov as its official government portal, providing residents, businesses, and visitors with access to a wide range of public services and information. The website features comprehensive content including services like job search, marriage licensing, birth certificate requests, and contact information for city staff. It also prominently displays profiles of elected officials, reinforcing its authoritative position as a government resource. The site targets a broad audience including local citizens, government employees, and businesses operating within San Francisco. Technically, SF.gov is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with a CMS likely based on Wagtail. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking and performance monitoring. The website is served over HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a robust security posture. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and explicit security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices such as enforcing HTTPS, implementing security headers, and avoiding exposure of sensitive data. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. The WHOIS data is limited, showing no registrar or creation date, but this is typical for government domains using privacy protection. The domain's legitimacy is supported by consistent branding and official content. Overall, SF.gov presents a secure, professional, and trustworthy online presence for the San Francisco government. Strategically, the site should enhance privacy compliance by implementing a cookie consent banner and publishing clear security policies and incident response contacts. Adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file would further improve transparency and trust. Regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools are recommended to maintain security and privacy standards. These steps will strengthen the site's compliance posture and user trust while maintaining its role as a critical public service platform.
Detected Technologies
11 urgent findings need attention
1 critical · 10 high
- + 3 more findings in the full report below
Keep sf.gov under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
7 findings
20/100
GDPR Compliance
4 findings
53/100
NIS2 Compliance
8 findings
17/100
Email Security
3 findings
85/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
SF.gov serves as the digital gateway for the City and County of San Francisco, positioning itself as the authoritative source for municipal services and information. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status, comprehensive service offerings, and integration with related government domains such as careers.sf.gov and sfbos.org. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service delivery and civic engagement. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government entity. The target customer segments include residents, city employees, businesses, and visitors. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and multi-language support, reflecting inclusivity and responsiveness. The partnership ecosystem includes various city departments and agencies, enhancing service integration. Operationally, the site demonstrates maturity with modern technology adoption and strong content governance.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity of SF.gov is high, evidenced by HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and absence of exposed sensitive data. The site uses modern frameworks and avoids vulnerable libraries, reducing attack surface. However, gaps exist in privacy compliance, notably the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit security policies. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contacts or procedures. Data protection practices appear sound, but transparency could be improved with a vulnerability disclosure program. The security culture is implied to be strong given the official nature and professional presentation, but explicit indicators are limited. Overall, the site balances strong technical security with opportunities to enhance compliance and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
City and County of San Francisco
Services and information from the City and County of San Francisco.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
excellent
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Secure headers present
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No vulnerable libraries detected
- Forms use proper input types and labels
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the sf.gov security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete sf.gov security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
HSTS Not Enabled
MEDIUMHTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Expired
CRITICALDomain expired 61 days ago
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
- •Domain expired 61 days ago
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does sf.gov compare?
See how sf.gov stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the sf.gov report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Scan your own website
Liked the sf.gov report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about sf.gov
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published