Is sfareportcard.com Safe? Security Analysis for Streets For All
https://sfareportcard.comCheck if sfareportcard.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for sfareportcard.com
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
Streets For All operates as a focused non-profit advocacy organization dedicated to advancing sustainable and equitable transportation policies in California. Their website serves as a comprehensive platform to assess and report on the performance of state legislators regarding transportation legislation, providing transparency and accountability to the public and stakeholders. The organization positions itself as a key influencer in California's transportation policy landscape, emphasizing legislative sponsorship, support, and public engagement. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React and Material-UI, hosted on DigitalOcean infrastructure. While the site offers rich content and a professional design, performance issues such as slow load times and lack of some security headers are noted. The site uses Umami for privacy-focused analytics, indicating a moderate approach to user tracking. From a security perspective, the site benefits from a valid SSL certificate but lacks advanced security headers and DNS protections like DNSSEC and DMARC. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to an email address, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the website is a credible and professional resource for transportation policy advocacy but would benefit from enhanced security practices and privacy compliance to strengthen trust and protect users. Performance optimizations and clearer privacy disclosures are recommended to improve user experience and regulatory adherence.
Detected Technologies
11 urgent findings need attention
11 high
- + 3 more findings in the full report below
Keep sfareportcard.com under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
8 findings
15/100
GDPR Compliance
4 findings
40/100
NIS2 Compliance
7 findings
25/100
Email Security
1 finding
50/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Streets For All occupies a niche within the California transportation advocacy sector, leveraging legislative tracking and policy sponsorship to influence state transportation and land use laws. Their business model centers on non-profit advocacy, engaging policymakers, advocates, and the public through detailed report cards and case studies. The organization demonstrates strong content expertise and a clear mission to shift California's transportation policies toward sustainability and equity. The website's detailed legislative data and scoring methodology provide transparency and empower stakeholders to hold legislators accountable. The presence of partnerships or related domains is not evident, suggesting a focused operational scope. Growth indicators include active legislative sponsorship and public engagement through the website. Strategically, Streets For All could expand its impact by enhancing digital infrastructure, improving privacy and security compliance, and broadening contact channels. Their current market position is that of a specialized advocacy group with a strong informational platform but limited digital maturity in privacy and security domains.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with a valid SSL certificate ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of critical security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of DNSSEC and DMARC records further exposes the domain to DNS spoofing and email phishing risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site does not appear to implement advanced incident response or security policies publicly. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which may expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in headers, DNS security, and privacy compliance to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the sfareportcard.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Insufficient contact information
MEDIUMGDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete sfareportcard.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Email Security Check Incomplete
MEDIUMSome email security checks timed out
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 35 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
HSTS Not Enabled
MEDIUMHTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does sfareportcard.com compare?
See how sfareportcard.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the sfareportcard.com report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Scan your own website
Liked the sfareportcard.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about sfareportcard.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published