What is the security status of springfieldmo.gov?

springfieldmo.gov has a security score of 51/100, rated as Moderate Risk. The website may have security concerns that should be addressed.

Is springfieldmo.gov safe to use?

Our security scan shows springfieldmo.gov is Moderate Risk. SSL security issues detected. Always practice safe browsing habits.

Does springfieldmo.gov have viruses?

Our comprehensive security scan analyzes multiple security factors. Based on the overall security score of 51/100, the website is rated as Moderate Risk. However, websites can change over time, so always use updated security software.

What is springfieldmo.gov's trust score?

springfieldmo.gov has a security score of 51/100. This score is based on multiple factors including SSL security, security headers, DNS health, and compliance checks.

I want to know if springfieldmo.gov is a legitimate website or if it's a scam.

According to our comprehensive security analysis, springfieldmo.gov has a security score of 51/100, which indicates it is Moderate Risk. The website www.springfieldmo.gov serves as the official digital portal for the City of Springfield, Missouri, providing residents, businesses, and visitors with access to government services, news, events, and community resources. The site is well-branded with official logos and maintains a consistent government identity. It targets a broad audience including local citizens and stakeholders, offering key municipal services and information. The business model is that of a government entity focused on public service and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on the CivicPlus CMS platform and utilizes a mix of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, jQuery UI, and AlpineJS, alongside Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and telemetry. The site is mobile responsive and offers a moderate level of performance and accessibility, though some improvements could be made in accessibility and updating legacy libraries. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements anti-forgery tokens in forms, indicating attention to secure data handling. However, some security headers are not explicitly detected, and the use of an older jQuery version may pose risks if not patched. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of clearly accessible privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet modern regulatory standards. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with no signs of malicious or adult content. The domain is a .gov TLD, which inherently carries legitimacy, though WHOIS data is not publicly available as typical for government domains. Strategic recommendations include updating JavaScript libraries, enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and improving accessibility features to ensure compliance and user trust.

Is springfieldmo.gov Safe? Security Analysis for City of Springfield, MO

https://springfieldmo.gov

Check if springfieldmo.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge

jQuery 2.2.4jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft Application Insights+1 more

Analyzed 10/12/2025Completed 12:06:19 PM

Security Score

MEDIUM RISK

Exclusive insights unlocked

Unlock the complete security report for springfieldmo.gov

Get full access to AI recommendations, compliance evidence, vulnerability remediation steps, and downloadable PDF reports. Upgrade once for lifetime access to this scan.

Full Report Access

All modules, AI insights, PDF download

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

How it works

Enter your email to receive the unlocked report.
Complete the secure EveryPay checkout (cards & local methods supported).
You’ll receive an email with your unique unlock code and the PDF export.

Delivery email

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainspringfieldmo.gov

Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

I have read and agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.I acknowledge the Returns & Refunds policy and understand the digital delivery terms.

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The website www.springfieldmo.gov serves as the official digital portal for the City of Springfield, Missouri, providing residents, businesses, and visitors with access to government services, news, events, and community… Unlock the full Guard report to read the complete analysis.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft Application InsightsCivicPlus CMS

Security Headers

6 findings

40/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

35/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

4 findings

75/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Snapshot shown below. Unlock the full AI report for complete market insights, audience profiling, and step-by-step recommendations.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The City of Springfield operates this website as its official government portal, positioning itself as a key municipal service provider in Missouri. The site supports transparency and community engagement through news updates, event calendars, and access to government resources. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service delivery. The site integrates with partner domains such as eCity and CityView for online services and live meetings, indicating a connected ecosystem. Growth indicators include active news publishing and community event promotion. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes local government initiatives and cultural institutions, enhancing its community presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery tokens implemented to protect form submissions. The use of Microsoft Application Insights and Google Tag Manager indicates monitoring and analytics capabilities. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The use of an older jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government site but requires enhancements to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

Upgrade to the full Guard report to access tailored remediation steps.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

A preview of your strategic observations is visible. Upgrade to unlock the full competitive positioning, trust signals, and branding checklist.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

City of Springfield, MO

Description:

Official website of Springfield, Missouri providing government information, services, news, events, and resources for residents, businesses, and visitors.

Key Services:

Government informationCity servicesCommunity news and alertsEvent calendarsBusiness resourcesEmployment opportunitiesPublic meetings and agendas

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:

jQuery 2.2.4jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerMicrosoft Application InsightsCivicPlus CMS

Frameworks:

CivicPlus CMS framework

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:

75/100

Best Practices:

HTTPS enforced
Anti-forgery tokens implemented in forms
Use of Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry
Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:

Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)Microsoft Application Insights

Tracking Level:moderate

Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:

Microsoft Application Insights

Marketing Tools:

Microsoft Application Insights

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good

User Experience:good

Content Relevance:good

Navigation Clarity:good

Professionalism:good

Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

Official municipal government website for Springfield, Missouri

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Some header findings are shown. Unlock to see the full checklist, impacted endpoints, and remediation guidance.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100

Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended) Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

You can see headline NIS2 checks. Upgrade to access the full control mapping, severity breakdown, and remediation plan.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100

Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Quick view of email authentication checks is provided. Unlock to uncover full DNS evidence, record diffs, and fix scripts.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100

Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none" Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

SPF

Sender Policy Framework

DKIM

DomainKeys Identified Mail

DMARC

Domain-based Message Authentication

MX Records

Mail Exchange Records

BIMI

Brand Indicators

MTA-STS

Mail Transfer Agent Security

TLS-RPT

TLS Reporting

DNSSEC

DNS Security

SPF Details

Record:

v=spf1 ip4:54.240.0.0/18 ip4:66.119.2.32/27 ip4:76.77.132.0/28 ip4:209.239.233.124 ip4:208.90.189.75 ip4:216.206.180.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

DNS Lookups:1/10

Policy:-all

DKIM Selectors Found

Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)

DMARC Details

Policy:none

Aggregate Reports:u6szrds0@ag.dmarcian.com

Forensic Reports:u6szrds0@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

This is a teaser of the TLS audit. Unlock to view certificate chains, cipher support tables, and remediation steps.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100

Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1 Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

Unlock the full DNS posture audit to reveal misconfigurations, zone records, and actionable fixes.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

25/100

Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Domain Expired

CRITICAL

Domain expired 34 days ago Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age

22 years(mature)

Expiry Risk

expired(expired)

Protection Level

basicDNSSEC OFF

Suspicious Indicators Detected

•Domain expired 34 days ago
•Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:20.114.211.29

Name Servers:

ns15.domaincontrol.com

ns16.domaincontrol.com

MX Records:

0: springfieldmo-gov.mail.protection.outlook.com

SOA:Serial: 2025070800, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:

v=spf1 ip4:54.240.0.0/18 ip4:66.119.2.32/27 ip4:76.77.132.0/28 ip4:209.239.233.124 ip4:208.90.189.75 ip4:216.206.180.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

See a glimpse of exposed services. Unlock to access full port inventories, CVE lookups, and mitigation priorities.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100

Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports Unlock the full report to read the complete fix.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Unlock to view the complete technical breakdown, stack fingerprinting, and hardening checklist.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Unlock the full Guard report to review the complete technical breakdown and AI recommendations.

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Analyze Another Website

Is springfieldmo.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - City of Springfield, MO Reviews

Is springfieldmo.gov Safe? Security Analysis for City of Springfield, MO

Unlock the complete security report for springfieldmo.gov

How it works

Order summary

AI Summary

Detected Technologies

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Business Intelligence

Security Posture Analysis

Strategic Recommendations

✨Observations

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

🛡️Security Headers

Security Headers

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

Missing X-Frame-Options header

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

Missing Referrer-Policy header

Missing Permissions-Policy header

Sensitive data may be cached

👤GDPR Compliance

GDPR Compliance

No Privacy Policy found

No Cookie Policy found

No Cookie Consent Banner found

Third-party services without privacy policy

GDPR Compliance Analysis

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

NIS2 Compliance

No information security framework found

No vulnerability disclosure policy

No security policy documentation found

No incident response procedures found

No business continuity planning found

No security contact information

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

No NIS2 reference found

📧Email Security

Email Security

DMARC not enforcing

No BIMI Record

No MTA-STS Policy

No TLS-RPT Record

SPF Details

DKIM Selectors Found

DMARC Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

SSL/TLS Security

Weak Protocols Supported

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

Weak SSL Key Length

Mixed Content Detected

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

Protocol Support

OCSP Status

📊DNS Health

DNS Health

DNSSEC Not Enabled

CAA Records Not Configured

Domain Expired

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

DMARC Policy Set to None

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

DNSSEC Status

DNS Performance

SPF Analysis

⚡Network Security

Network Security

Good Network Security Posture