Skip to main content

Is typography.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Jeremy Tankard Typography

typography.net Security Report Summary

typography.net received a security score of 65 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Jeremy Tankard Typography's website security posture. Jeremy Tankard Typography operates in the Other industry in N/a.

Jeremy Tankard Typography is an independent digital type foundry specializing in unique font designs. Established in 1998, the company offers a curated selection of font families targeting design professionals and creative agencies. The website showcases their font collections with rich visual samples and provides navigation to explore, license, and support their products. Technically, the site uses a custom-built platform leveraging jQuery and modern font loading techniques, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain management best practices, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a basic cookie policy, but lacks a detailed privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

The security scan identified 30 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery 2.1.4, jQuery UI 1.9.2, jQuery Backstretch, Picturefill, WebFont Loader, Cloudflare DNS.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

typography.net favicon

Is typography.net Safe? Security Analysis for Jeremy Tankard Typography

https://typography.net

Check if typography.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 2.1.4jQuery UI 1.9.2jQuery BackstretchPicturefillWebFont Loader+1 more
Analyzed 10/12/2025Completed 8:16:50 PM6mo ago
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for typography.net

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domaintypography.net
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Jeremy Tankard Typography is an independent digital type foundry specializing in unique font designs. Established in 1998, the company offers a curated selection of font families targeting design professionals and creative agencies. The website showcases their font collections with rich visual samples and provides navigation to explore, license, and support their products. Technically, the site uses a custom-built platform leveraging jQuery and modern font loading techniques, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain management best practices, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a basic cookie policy, but lacks a detailed privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.1.4jQuery UI 1.9.2jQuery BackstretchPicturefillWebFont LoaderCloudflare DNS

7 urgent findings need attention

7 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep typography.net under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for typography.net.

Security Headers

7 findings

30/100

GDPR Compliance

2 findings

83/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

6 findings

55/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in a niche market of digital typography, focusing on font design and licensing. Its long domain age and consistent branding indicate a stable market position. The partnership with StudioType suggests collaboration within the typography industry. Revenue likely derives from font sales and licensing agreements. The target customers are designers and agencies seeking distinctive typefaces. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage may indicate a controlled client engagement model, possibly via client area login. The company maintains a focused online presence with social media integration to enhance brand visibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security headers were detected in the provided data, representing a potential area for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency in security incident handling.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Jeremy Tankard Typography

Description:

Independent digital type foundry

Key Services:
Font designFont licensingFont explorationClient area services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.1.4jQuery UI 1.9.2jQuery BackstretchPicturefillWebFont LoaderCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • External links open in new tabs

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and branding.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the typography.net security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete typography.net security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mtasv.net ip4:185.151.44.199 a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:typography.net
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/22/2025 (40 days)
SANs:typography.net, *.typography.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(111 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.64.146.12, 104.18.41.244
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3103::6812:29f4, 2606:4700:4404::ac40:920c
Name Servers:
laila.ns.cloudflare.com
watson.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mail.typography.net
SOA:Serial: 2385005957, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mtasv.net ip4:185.151.44.199 a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does typography.net compare?

See how typography.net stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom-built platform with jQuery 2.1.4 and jQuery UI 1.9.2, which are somewhat dated but functional. It employs Picturefill for responsive images and WebFont Loader for custom fonts, indicating attention to typography presentation. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, improving DNS reliability and performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS and JavaScript. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some potential for improvement by updating libraries and optimizing assets. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or major frameworks were detected, suggesting a bespoke solution.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the typography.net report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domaintypography.net
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the typography.net report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about typography.net

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website